PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMAAX vs. THMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMAAX vs. THMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) and Thrivent Moderate Allocation Fund (THMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMAAX achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly higher than THMAX's 6.71% return. Over the past 10 years, TMAAX has outperformed THMAX with an annualized return of 9.80%, while THMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.44% annualized return.


TMAAX

1D
0.20%
1M
3.49%
YTD
8.70%
6M
9.46%
1Y
22.34%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
8.98%
10Y*
9.80%

THMAX

1D
0.11%
1M
2.87%
YTD
6.71%
6M
7.26%
1Y
19.06%
3Y*
15.91%
5Y*
7.86%
10Y*
8.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMAAX vs. THMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMAAX
Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A
8.70%15.13%19.29%17.06%-17.79%15.74%14.13%21.47%-6.30%11.50%
THMAX
Thrivent Moderate Allocation Fund
6.71%13.27%18.33%15.69%-16.43%11.95%13.29%18.35%-4.94%9.24%

Correlation

The correlation between TMAAX and THMAX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.99

The correlation between TMAAX and THMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMAAX vs. THMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMAAX
TMAAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TMAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
TMAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

THMAX
THMAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
THMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
THMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
THMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
THMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMAAX vs. THMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) and Thrivent Moderate Allocation Fund (THMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMAAXTHMAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.28

2.37

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.19

3.35

-0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.44

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.17

-0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.45

14.24

-0.79

TMAAX vs. THMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the THMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMAAX and THMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMAAXTHMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.37

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.68

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.79

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.53

-0.07

Drawdowns

TMAAX vs. THMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMAAX drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, which is greater than THMAX's maximum drawdown of -41.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAAX and THMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMAAXTHMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.54%

-41.95%

-8.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.55%

-6.10%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.37%

-11.85%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.55%

-24.22%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.99%

-24.22%

-2.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.36%

-5.53%

-1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.36%

+0.33%

Volatility

TMAAX vs. THMAX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to Thrivent Moderate Allocation Fund (THMAX) at 2.31%. This indicates that TMAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMAAXTHMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

2.31%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.86%

6.36%

+1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.10%

8.22%

+1.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

11.65%

+2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.32%

10.74%

+2.58%

TMAAX vs. THMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMAAX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than THMAX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMAAX vs. THMAX - Dividend Comparison

TMAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, which matches THMAX's 6.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
THMAX
Thrivent Moderate Allocation Fund
6.64%7.15%12.28%2.96%1.39%6.31%4.00%5.24%4.38%1.40%1.29%1.20%
TMAAX
Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A
6.70%7.29%11.82%3.55%3.03%6.94%4.16%6.27%6.01%1.10%0.99%0.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, TMAAX and THMAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TMAAX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to THMAX (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMAAX dropped -50.54% vs THMAX's -41.95%.

THMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMAAX and THMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer