TMRC vs. ALB
TMRC (Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp) and ALB (Albemarle Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — TMRC in Other Industrial Metals & Mining, ALB in Specialty Chemicals. Over the past 10 years, TMRC returned 19.51%/yr vs 9.53%/yr for ALB. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TMRC vs. ALB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMRC achieves a 43.77% return, which is significantly higher than ALB's 21.10% return. Over the past 10 years, TMRC has outperformed ALB with an annualized return of 19.51%, while ALB has yielded a comparatively lower 9.53% annualized return.
TMRC
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -16.19%
- YTD
- 43.77%
- 6M
- -3.24%
- 1Y
- 37.41%
- 3Y*
- -2.09%
- 5Y*
- -16.97%
- 10Y*
- 19.51%
ALB
- 1D
- 7.42%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- 21.10%
- 6M
- 29.03%
- 1Y
- 184.47%
- 3Y*
- -7.90%
- 5Y*
- 1.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
TMRC vs. ALB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMRC Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp | 43.77% | 144.74% | -41.84% | -67.01% | -33.83% | 11.30% | 43.90% | 397.98% | 17.62% | 91.78% |
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 21.10% | 67.72% | -39.50% | -32.80% | -6.63% | 59.76% | 105.39% | -3.28% | -38.89% | 50.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMRC and ALB is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
TMRC:
$71.96M
ALB:
$20.21B
TMRC:
-$0.03
ALB:
-$2.33
TMRC:
16.86
ALB:
2.65
TMRC:
$0.00
ALB:
$5.49B
TMRC:
$0.00
ALB:
$1.02B
TMRC:
-$1.31M
ALB:
$801.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMRC vs. ALB — Risk / Return Rank
TMRC
ALB
TMRC vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp (TMRC) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMRC | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.38 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 5.66 | -5.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.68 | 17.15 | -16.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMRC vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMRC drawdown since its inception was -95.42%, which is greater than ALB's maximum drawdown of -83.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMRC and ALB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMRC | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.42% | -83.90% | -11.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.33% | -31.72% | -45.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.33% | -78.60% | -4.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.57% | -83.90% | -7.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.42% | -83.90% | -11.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.83% | -44.87% | -35.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.95% | -20.68% | -33.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 55.57% | 10.46% | +45.11% |
Volatility
TMRC vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison
Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp (TMRC) has a higher volatility of 31.26% compared to Albemarle Corporation (ALB) at 16.97%. This indicates that TMRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMRC | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 31.26% | 16.97% | +14.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 88.45% | 42.66% | +45.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 157.98% | 62.67% | +95.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.30% | 54.64% | +54.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 109.54% | 48.35% | +61.19% |
Dividends
TMRC vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison
TMRC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 0.95% | 1.15% | 1.87% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% |
TMRC Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TMRC vs. ALB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TMRC and ALB have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMRC has higher volatility (31.26%) compared to ALB (16.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMRC dropped -95.42% vs ALB's -83.90%.
ALB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMRC and ALB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer