TMRC vs. APXCF
TMRC (Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp) and APXCF (Apex Critical Metals Corp) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past year, TMRC returned 17.13% vs 105.26% for APXCF. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TMRC vs. APXCF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMRC achieves a 43.77% return, which is significantly higher than APXCF's -28.75% return.
TMRC
- 1D
- -4.24%
- 1M
- -15.38%
- YTD
- 43.77%
- 6M
- 20.38%
- 1Y
- 17.13%
- 3Y*
- -2.52%
- 5Y*
- -15.56%
- 10Y*
- 19.51%
APXCF
- 1D
- -5.00%
- 1M
- -10.24%
- YTD
- -28.75%
- 6M
- -35.45%
- 1Y
- 105.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMRC vs. APXCF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TMRC Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp | 43.77% | 144.74% | -3.44% |
APXCF Apex Critical Metals Corp | -28.75% | 213.05% | 26.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMRC and APXCF is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2024 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMRC vs. APXCF — Risk / Return Rank
TMRC
APXCF
TMRC vs. APXCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp (TMRC) and Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMRC | APXCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.24 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 1.44 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.30 | 2.44 | -2.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMRC vs. APXCF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMRC drawdown since its inception was -95.42%, which is greater than APXCF's maximum drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMRC and APXCF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMRC | APXCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.42% | -73.63% | -21.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.33% | -73.63% | -3.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -95.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -80.83% | -67.44% | -13.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.01% | -31.55% | -22.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.51% | 43.38% | +13.13% |
Volatility
TMRC vs. APXCF - Volatility Comparison
Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp (TMRC) has a higher volatility of 26.95% compared to Apex Critical Metals Corp (APXCF) at 25.01%. This indicates that TMRC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APXCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMRC | APXCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.95% | 25.01% | +1.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 87.03% | 64.07% | +22.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 156.48% | 116.36% | +40.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.40% | 127.80% | -18.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 109.55% | 127.80% | -18.25% |
Dividends
TMRC vs. APXCF - Dividend Comparison
Neither TMRC nor APXCF has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
TMRC vs. APXCF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp and Apex Critical Metals Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TMRC and APXCF have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMRC has higher volatility (26.95%) compared to APXCF (25.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMRC dropped -95.42% vs APXCF's -73.63%.
APXCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMRC and APXCF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer