PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMO vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMO vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMO achieves a -16.73% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 74.25% return. Over the past 10 years, TMO has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 12.47%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.


TMO

1D
1.70%
1M
3.27%
YTD
-16.73%
6M
-16.06%
1Y
19.85%
3Y*
-2.11%
5Y*
1.72%
10Y*
12.47%

SMH

1D
-1.63%
1M
20.06%
YTD
74.25%
6M
74.08%
1Y
150.04%
3Y*
63.96%
5Y*
38.76%
10Y*
37.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMO vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMO
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
-16.73%11.78%-1.72%-3.36%-17.29%43.54%43.72%45.55%18.21%35.03%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
74.25%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between TMO and SMH is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2000

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between TMO and SMH has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMO vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMO
TMO Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMO vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMOSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.69

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

10.11

-9.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.43

38.76

-37.33

TMO vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMO and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMOSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

4.94

-4.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

1.11

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

1.15

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.34

+0.06

Drawdowns

TMO vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMO drawdown since its inception was -71.16%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMO and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMOSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.16%

-84.96%

+13.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.38%

-14.93%

-16.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.28%

-35.74%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.95%

-45.30%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.95%

-45.30%

+4.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.88%

-1.63%

-25.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.01%

-41.08%

+23.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.89%

3.89%

+10.00%

Volatility

TMO vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO) is 9.81%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.58%. This indicates that TMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMOSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.81%

11.58%

-1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.51%

24.35%

-2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.94%

30.57%

+0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.12%

35.01%

-7.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.31%

32.57%

-6.26%

Dividends

TMO vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

TMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%
TMO
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
0.37%0.30%0.30%0.26%0.22%0.16%0.19%0.23%0.30%0.32%0.43%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMO and SMH have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to TMO (9.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMO dropped -71.16% vs SMH's -84.96%.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMO and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer