TMO vs. DHR
TMO (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) and DHR (Danaher Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Diagnostics & Research industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 10 years, TMO returned 12.49%/yr vs 10.85%/yr for DHR. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TMO vs. DHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMO achieves a -16.72% return, which is significantly higher than DHR's -22.91% return. Over the past 10 years, TMO has outperformed DHR with an annualized return of 12.49%, while DHR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.85% annualized return.
TMO
- 1D
- -2.42%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- YTD
- -16.72%
- 6M
- -16.79%
- 1Y
- 22.04%
- 3Y*
- -2.20%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
DHR
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- -22.91%
- 6M
- -22.00%
- 1Y
- -6.29%
- 3Y*
- -4.88%
- 5Y*
- -3.34%
- 10Y*
- 10.85%
TMO vs. DHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | -16.72% | 11.78% | -1.72% | -3.36% | -17.29% | 43.54% | 43.72% | 45.55% | 18.21% | 35.03% |
DHR Danaher Corporation | -22.91% | 0.35% | -0.35% | -1.22% | -19.02% | 48.57% | 45.34% | 49.55% | 11.80% | 20.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMO and DHR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 1987 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, TMO and DHR have become more correlated (0.75) than their long-term average of 0.45, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
TMO:
$179.82B
DHR:
$125.25B
TMO:
$18.22
DHR:
$5.17
TMO:
26.46
DHR:
34.07
TMO:
4.02
DHR:
5.07
TMO:
3.46
DHR:
2.37
TMO:
$45.20B
DHR:
$24.78B
TMO:
$17.81B
DHR:
$15.04B
TMO:
$11.16B
DHR:
$6.69B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMO vs. DHR — Risk / Return Rank
TMO
DHR
TMO vs. DHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMO | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | -0.23 | +0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | -0.14 | +1.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.98 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | -0.20 | +0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.47 | -0.50 | +1.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMO | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | -0.23 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | -0.12 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.43 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.64 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
TMO vs. DHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMO drawdown since its inception was -71.16%, which is greater than DHR's maximum drawdown of -45.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMO and DHR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMO | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.16% | -45.80% | -25.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.38% | -32.97% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.28% | -41.72% | +4.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.95% | -43.81% | +2.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.95% | -43.81% | +2.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.87% | -38.88% | +12.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.01% | -10.20% | -7.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.71% | 13.16% | +0.55% |
Volatility
TMO vs. DHR - Volatility Comparison
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO) has a higher volatility of 9.66% compared to Danaher Corporation (DHR) at 7.80%. This indicates that TMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMO | DHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.66% | 7.80% | +1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.40% | 18.82% | +2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.90% | 27.67% | +3.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.11% | 27.92% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.31% | 25.48% | +0.83% |
Dividends
TMO vs. DHR - Dividend Comparison
TMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than DHR's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHR Danaher Corporation | 0.77% | 0.56% | 0.47% | 12.64% | 0.38% | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.62% | 0.60% | 32.55% | 0.58% |
TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 0.37% | 0.30% | 0.30% | 0.26% | 0.22% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.23% | 0.30% | 0.32% | 0.43% | 0.42% |
Financials
TMO vs. DHR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. and Danaher Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TMO vs. DHR - Profitability Comparison
TMO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.48B and revenue of 11.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.7%.
DHR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.59B and revenue of 5.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.3%.
TMO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. reported an operating income of 1.86B and revenue of 11.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.9%.
DHR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported an operating income of 1.34B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.6%.
TMO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. reported a net income of 1.65B and revenue of 11.01B, resulting in a net margin of 15.0%.
DHR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Danaher Corporation reported a net income of 1.03B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in a net margin of 17.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TMO and DHR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMO has higher volatility (9.66%) compared to DHR (7.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMO dropped -71.16% vs DHR's -45.80%.
TMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMO and DHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer