TMHC vs. SPYV
TMHC (Taylor Morrison Home Corporation) is a stock, while SPYV (SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Value Index. Over the past 10 years, TMHC returned 17.21%/yr vs 12.08%/yr for SPYV. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
TMHC vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMHC achieves a 22.13% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 8.25% return. Over the past 10 years, TMHC has outperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 17.21%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.08% annualized return.
TMHC
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 26.25%
- YTD
- 22.13%
- 6M
- 14.86%
- 1Y
- 23.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.27%
- 5Y*
- 20.87%
- 10Y*
- 17.21%
SPYV
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 8.25%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 15.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
TMHC vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMHC Taylor Morrison Home Corporation | 22.13% | -3.82% | 14.73% | 75.78% | -13.19% | 36.30% | 17.34% | 37.48% | -35.02% | 27.05% |
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 8.25% | 13.18% | 12.24% | 22.20% | -5.28% | 24.91% | 1.38% | 31.70% | -9.01% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMHC and SPYV is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2013 | 0.51 |
The correlation between TMHC and SPYV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMHC vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank
TMHC
SPYV
TMHC vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMHC | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.37 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.89 | 3.33 | -2.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.66 | 12.73 | -11.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMHC vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMHC drawdown since its inception was -75.18%, which is greater than SPYV's maximum drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMHC and SPYV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMHC | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.18% | -58.45% | -16.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.80% | -6.22% | -17.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.90% | -17.54% | -10.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.84% | -17.89% | -22.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.18% | -36.89% | -38.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.88% | -0.18% | -3.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.26% | -8.71% | -11.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.79% | 1.63% | +11.16% |
Volatility
TMHC vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison
Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) has a higher volatility of 21.03% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.70%. This indicates that TMHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMHC | SPYV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.03% | 2.70% | +18.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.55% | 7.26% | +22.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.09% | 9.97% | +29.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.83% | 14.42% | +23.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.77% | 16.94% | +27.83% |
Dividends
TMHC vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison
TMHC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYV SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 1.68% | 1.77% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 2.38% | 2.25% | 2.97% | 2.77% | 2.39% | 2.53% |
TMHC Taylor Morrison Home Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMHC and SPYV have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMHC has higher volatility (21.03%) compared to SPYV (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMHC dropped -75.18% vs SPYV's -58.45%.
SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMHC and SPYV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer