TMHC vs. ZG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) and Zillow Group, Inc. (ZG).

Performance

TMHC vs. ZG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) and Zillow Group, Inc. (ZG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TMHC vs. ZG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TMHC Taylor Morrison Home Corporation	-1.07%	-3.82%	14.73%	75.78%	-13.19%	36.30%	17.34%	37.48%	-35.02%	27.05%
ZG Zillow Group, Inc.	-39.34%	-3.70%	24.91%	81.74%	-49.84%	-54.23%	197.20%	45.53%	-22.85%	11.77%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TMHC : $5.75B ZG : $10.45B
EPS TMHC : $7.83 ZG : $0.09
PE Ratio TMHC : 7.44 ZG : 456.07
PEG Ratio TMHC : 0.46 ZG : 3.09
PS Ratio TMHC : 0.72 ZG : 4.06
PB Ratio TMHC : 0.91 ZG : 2.14
Total Revenue (TTM) TMHC : $8.12B ZG : $2.58B
Gross Profit (TTM) TMHC : $1.88B ZG : $1.92B
EBITDA (TTM) TMHC : $1.16B ZG : $235.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMHC achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly higher than ZG's -39.34% return. Over the past 10 years, TMHC has outperformed ZG with an annualized return of 15.15%, while ZG has yielded a comparatively lower 5.26% annualized return.

TMHC

• 1D: 1.80%
• 1M: -11.61%
• YTD: -1.07%
• 6M: -11.77%
• 1Y: -3.00%
• 3Y*: 15.03%
• 5Y*: 12.96%
• 10Y*: 15.15%

ZG

• 1D: 1.87%
• 1M: -7.61%
• YTD: -39.34%
• 6M: -44.40%
• 1Y: -38.09%
• 3Y*: -1.79%
• 5Y*: -21.11%
• 10Y*: 5.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TMHC vs. ZG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMHC

TMHC Risk / Return Rank: 36
TMHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
TMHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
TMHC Omega Ratio Rank: 32
TMHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
TMHC Martin Ratio Rank: 38

ZG

ZG Risk / Return Rank: 10
ZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
ZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
ZG Omega Ratio Rank: 10
ZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
ZG Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMHC vs. ZG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) and Zillow Group, Inc. (ZG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TMHC	ZG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.09	-0.87	+0.78
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.12	-1.12	+1.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	0.86	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.14	-0.72	+0.58
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.26	-1.69	+1.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TMHC vs. ZG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMHC Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is higher than the ZG Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMHC and ZG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMHC	ZG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09	-0.87	+0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	-0.40	+0.76
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.34	0.10	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.02	+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between TMHC and ZG is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

TMHC vs. ZG - Dividend Comparison

Neither TMHC nor ZG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TMHC vs. ZG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMHC drawdown since its inception was -75.18%, smaller than the maximum ZG drawdown of -89.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMHC and ZG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMHC	ZG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.18%	-89.36%	+14.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.43%	-53.42%	+32.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.84%	-81.90%	+41.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.18%	-86.74%	+11.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.14%	-79.69%	+57.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.31%	-56.37%	+36.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.99%	22.68%	-11.69%

Volatility

TMHC vs. ZG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) is 7.60%, while Zillow Group, Inc. (ZG) has a volatility of 15.50%. This indicates that TMHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMHC	ZG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.60%	15.50%	-7.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.32%	35.09%	-14.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.52%	43.95%	-10.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.63%	52.72%	-16.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.21%	53.17%	-8.96%

Financials

TMHC vs. ZG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Taylor Morrison Home Corporation and Zillow Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TMHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation reported a gross profit of 462.83M and revenue of 2.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.0%.

ZG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zillow Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 476.00M and revenue of 654.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.8%.

TMHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation reported an operating income of 268.20M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.8%.

ZG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zillow Group, Inc. reported an operating income of -11.00M and revenue of 654.00M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.7%.

TMHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation reported a net income of 174.02M and revenue of 2.10B, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.

ZG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zillow Group, Inc. reported a net income of 3.00M and revenue of 654.00M, resulting in a net margin of 0.5%.