PortfoliosLab logo
TMHC vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between TMHC and COST is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

TMHC vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
150.39%
1,105.28%
TMHC
COST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TMHC:

0.08

COST:

1.75

Sortino Ratio

TMHC:

0.36

COST:

2.32

Omega Ratio

TMHC:

1.04

COST:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

TMHC:

0.09

COST:

2.24

Martin Ratio

TMHC:

0.20

COST:

6.61

Ulcer Index

TMHC:

12.85%

COST:

5.85%

Daily Std Dev

TMHC:

33.27%

COST:

22.07%

Max Drawdown

TMHC:

-75.18%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

TMHC:

-22.87%

COST:

-6.04%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TMHC:

$5.91B

COST:

$450.29B

EPS

TMHC:

$8.59

COST:

$17.15

PE Ratio

TMHC:

6.86

COST:

59.18

PEG Ratio

TMHC:

1.51

COST:

5.34

PS Ratio

TMHC:

0.71

COST:

1.71

PB Ratio

TMHC:

0.99

COST:

17.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

TMHC:

$8.36B

COST:

$264.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TMHC:

$2.03B

COST:

$35.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

TMHC:

$1.29B

COST:

$11.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMHC achieves a -5.75% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, TMHC has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 11.96%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.57% annualized return.


TMHC

YTD

-5.75%

1M

-2.91%

6M

-19.53%

1Y

-1.59%

5Y*

32.32%

10Y*

11.96%

COST

YTD

10.55%

1M

10.40%

6M

13.79%

1Y

34.28%

5Y*

29.32%

10Y*

23.57%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TMHC vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMHC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TMHC is 5151
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TMHC is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TMHC is 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TMHC is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TMHC is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TMHC is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COST is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COST is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COST is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COST is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COST is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COST is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TMHC vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TMHC Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMHC and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.08
1.75
TMHC
COST

Dividends

TMHC vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

TMHC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TMHC
Taylor Morrison Home Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.47%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%

Drawdowns

TMHC vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMHC drawdown since its inception was -75.18%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMHC and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-22.87%
-6.04%
TMHC
COST

Volatility

TMHC vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) has a higher volatility of 13.03% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 8.36%. This indicates that TMHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
13.03%
8.36%
TMHC
COST

Financials

TMHC vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Taylor Morrison Home Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20212022202320242025
1.90B
63.72B
(TMHC) Total Revenue
(COST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TMHC vs. COST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Taylor Morrison Home Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%20212022202320242025
24.4%
15.1%
(TMHC) Gross Margin
(COST) Gross Margin
TMHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation reported a gross profit of 463.27M and revenue of 1.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.

COST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of 9.61B and revenue of 63.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

TMHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation reported an operating income of 286.65M and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.

COST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.6%.

TMHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation reported a net income of 213.47M and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.

COST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 1.79B and revenue of 63.72B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.