TMHC vs. RL
TMHC (Taylor Morrison Home Corporation) and RL (Ralph Lauren Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — TMHC in Residential Construction, RL in Apparel Manufacturing. Over the past 10 years, TMHC returned 15.53%/yr vs 17.34%/yr for RL. Their 0.39 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TMHC vs. RL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMHC achieves a 23.07% return, which is significantly higher than RL's 8.12% return. Over the past 10 years, TMHC has underperformed RL with an annualized return of 15.53%, while RL has yielded a comparatively higher 17.34% annualized return.
TMHC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- YTD
- 23.07%
- 1Y
- 17.40%
- 3Y*
- 13.14%
- 5Y*
- 23.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.90%
RL
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -4.49%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- YTD
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- 30.86%
- 3Y*
- 44.57%
- 5Y*
- 29.95%
- 10Y*
- 17.34%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.95%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $177.30M | $209.97M | $261.41M | |
| $198.07M | $202.28M | $218.49M |
TMHC vs. RL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMHC Taylor Morrison Home Corporation | 23.07% | -3.82% | 14.73% | 75.78% | -13.19% | 36.30% | 17.34% | 37.48% | -35.02% | 27.05% |
RL Ralph Lauren Corporation | 8.12% | 55.03% | 62.85% | 39.82% | -8.41% | 16.66% | -10.63% | 16.07% | 1.82% | 17.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMHC and RL is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2013 | 0.39 |
Fundamentals
TMHC:
$6.67B
RL:
$23.20B
TMHC:
$6.81
RL:
$15.09
TMHC:
10.64
RL:
25.21
TMHC:
0.66
RL:
1.40
TMHC:
0.94
RL:
2.92
TMHC:
1.13
RL:
8.34
TMHC:
$7.61B
RL:
$8.11B
TMHC:
$1.71B
RL:
$5.67B
TMHC:
$1.00B
RL:
$1.18B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMHC vs. RL — Risk / Return Rank
TMHC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RL
TMHC vs. RL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) and Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMHC | RL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.16 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 1.63 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.53 | 4.84 | -3.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMHC vs. RL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMHC drawdown since its inception was -75.18%, which is greater than RL's maximum drawdown of -68.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMHC and RL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMHC | RL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.18% | -68.62% | -6.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.80% | -17.67% | -6.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.90% | -36.18% | +8.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.84% | -36.51% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.18% | -55.14% | -20.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.14% | -7.96% | +4.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.12% | -24.02% | +3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.64% | 5.94% | +6.70% |
Volatility
TMHC vs. RL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) is 0.78%, while Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) has a volatility of 10.54%. This indicates that TMHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMHC | RL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | 10.54% | -9.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.65% | 28.79% | -1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.78% | 35.67% | +1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.47% | 37.12% | +0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.61% | 38.74% | +5.87% |
Dividends
TMHC vs. RL - Dividend Comparison
TMHC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RL Ralph Lauren Corporation | 0.98% | 1.01% | 1.40% | 2.08% | 2.78% | 1.74% | 0.66% | 2.29% | 2.30% | 1.93% | 2.21% | 1.79% |
TMHC Taylor Morrison Home Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TMHC vs. RL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Taylor Morrison Home Corporation and Ralph Lauren Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TMHC vs. RL - Profitability Comparison
TMHC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation reported a gross profit of 290.64M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.
RL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ralph Lauren Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.38B and revenue of 1.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.7%.
TMHC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation reported an operating income of 141.79M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.2%.
RL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ralph Lauren Corporation reported an operating income of 156.80M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.
TMHC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation reported a net income of 100.43M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.
RL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ralph Lauren Corporation reported a net income of 151.60M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TMHC and RL have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RL has higher volatility (10.54%) compared to TMHC (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMHC dropped -75.18% vs RL's -68.62%.
RL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMHC and RL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer