TMH vs. XRT
TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return while XRT tracks the S&P Retail Select Industry. Both are passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XRT.
Performance
TMH vs. XRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMH
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XRT
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- -1.99%
- 6M
- -2.00%
- 1Y
- 8.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.38%
- 5Y*
- -0.84%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
TMH vs. XRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -5.59% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | -2.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMH and XRT is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMH vs. XRT — Risk / Return Rank
TMH
XRT
TMH vs. XRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMH | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -5.39 | 0.35 | -5.74 |
Drawdowns
TMH vs. XRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, smaller than the maximum XRT drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and XRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMH | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.59% | -65.81% | +60.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.59% | -13.82% | +8.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -15.00% | +10.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.85% | — |
Volatility
TMH vs. XRT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMH | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.85% | 20.42% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 26.90% | -6.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 27.16% | -6.31% |
TMH vs. XRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than XRT's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMH vs. XRT - Dividend Comparison
TMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 0.83% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.40% | 2.15% | 1.55% | 1.01% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.52% | 1.36% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMH and XRT have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XRT.
XRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for TMH.
TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.35% for XRT.
Find the right allocation for TMH and XRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer