XRT vs. RTH
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH).
XRT and RTH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XRT is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Retail Select Industry. It was launched on Jun 19, 2006. RTH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both XRT and RTH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XRT or RTH.
Key characteristics
| XRT | RTH | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.35% | 7.70% |
| 1Y Return | 31.33% | 23.55% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -4.39% | 6.68% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 14.60% | 15.19% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.96% | 14.64% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.26 | 1.84 |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.36% | 12.36% |
| Max Drawdown | -65.82% | -42.16% |
| Current Drawdown | -21.86% | -4.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between XRT and RTH is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XRT vs. RTH - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XRT having a 7.35% return and RTH slightly higher at 7.70%. Over the past 10 years, XRT has underperformed RTH with an annualized return of 7.96%, while RTH has yielded a comparatively higher 14.64% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XRT vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XRT and RTH have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XRT vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XRT vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison
XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than RTH's 0.99% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 1.23% | 1.40% | 2.15% | 1.55% | 1.01% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.52% | 1.36% | 1.30% | 0.74% | 0.60% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.99% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.04% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% | 0.40% | 0.99% |
Drawdowns
XRT vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XRT drawdown since its inception was -65.82%, which is greater than RTH's maximum drawdown of -42.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRT and RTH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XRT vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) at 3.30%. This indicates that XRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.