XRT vs. FDIS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) and FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - XRT tracks the S&P Retail Select Industry while FDIS tracks the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XRT returned 9.22%/yr vs 13.99%/yr for FDIS. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XRT charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FDIS.

Performance

XRT vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRT achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly higher than FDIS's -1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, XRT has underperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 9.22%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.

XRT

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 3.82%
• YTD: 0.75%
• 6M: -1.40%
• 1Y: 12.23%
• 3Y*: 12.77%
• 5Y*: -0.81%
• 10Y*: 9.22%

FDIS

• 1D: -1.74%
• 1M: -1.89%
• YTD: -1.40%
• 6M: -3.81%
• 1Y: 11.16%
• 3Y*: 12.93%
• 5Y*: 5.44%
• 10Y*: 13.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XRT vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF	0.75%	8.07%	11.78%	21.53%	-31.64%	42.60%	41.91%	14.12%	-8.04%	4.22%
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF	-1.40%	5.67%	24.43%	40.48%	-35.23%	24.25%	49.50%	27.44%	-0.88%	22.96%

Correlation

The correlation between XRT and FDIS is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.74
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013	0.77

The correlation between XRT and FDIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

XRT vs. FDIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XRT	FDIS
Consumer Cyclical	76.5%	96.7%
Consumer Defensive	19.2%	1.1%
Communication Services	1.5%	0.3%
Technology	1.4%	1.0%
Energy	1.3%	-
Healthcare	1.3%	0.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Industrials	-	0.9%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XRT vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XRT

XRT Risk / Return Rank: 19
XRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
XRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
XRT Omega Ratio Rank: 17
XRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
XRT Martin Ratio Rank: 19

FDIS

FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 18
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 17
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XRT vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XRT	FDIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.60	0.60	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.02	0.96	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.11	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.91	0.72	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.06	2.21	-0.16

XRT vs. FDIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the FDIS Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRT and FDIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XRT vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRT drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRT and FDIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	XRT	FDIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.81%	-39.16%	-26.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.53%	-15.50%	+1.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.62%	-27.43%	+1.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.57%	-39.16%	-5.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.02%	-39.16%	-7.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.42%	-5.93%	-5.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.99%	-7.49%	-7.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.96%	5.05%	+0.91%

Volatility

XRT vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) have volatilities of 6.41% and 6.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XRT	FDIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.41%	6.33%	+0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.33%	13.87%	+0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.64%	18.76%	+1.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.93%	23.98%	+2.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.20%	22.36%	+4.84%

XRT vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

XRT vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison

XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than FDIS's 0.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF	0.74%	0.75%	0.69%	0.78%	1.00%	0.58%	0.59%	1.14%	1.29%	1.00%	1.62%	1.25%
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF	1.03%	0.77%	1.52%	1.40%	2.15%	1.55%	1.01%	1.57%	1.51%	1.52%	1.36%	1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XRT and FDIS in my portfolio?

XRT and FDIS have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XRT or FDIS?

XRT has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to FDIS (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRT dropped -65.81% vs FDIS's -39.16%.

Which ETF is better, XRT or FDIS?

On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.99% vs 9.22% for XRT. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XRT or FDIS?

Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 9.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XRT or FDIS?

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XRT or FDIS?

XRT has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.74% for FDIS.

What is the main difference between XRT and FDIS?

XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry, while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XRT and 0.08% for FDIS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.