PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XRT vs. FDIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XRT vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XRT achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly higher than FDIS's -0.23% return. Over the past 10 years, XRT has underperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 9.06%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.50% annualized return.


XRT

1D
-0.88%
1M
1.95%
6M
4.50%
YTD
5.78%
1Y
16.25%
3Y*
11.34%
5Y*
0.37%
10Y*
9.06%
ALL TIME*
9.58%

FDIS

1D
2.63%
1M
-1.18%
6M
-1.58%
YTD
-0.23%
1Y
9.49%
3Y*
11.49%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
13.50%
ALL TIME*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.73M$7.77M$9.21M
$422.92M$379.59M$454.03M

XRT vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
5.78%8.07%11.78%21.53%-31.64%42.60%41.91%14.12%-8.04%4.22%
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
-0.23%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%

Correlation

The correlation between XRT and FDIS is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.77

The correlation between XRT and FDIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

XRT vs. FDIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XRT
FDIS

Consumer Cyclical

75.2%
96.2%

Consumer Defensive

18.7%
1.2%

Technology

2.7%
1.0%

Communication Services

1.8%
0.3%

Healthcare

1.6%
0.1%

Energy

1.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Industrials

-

1.1%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

XRT
75.2%
FDIS
96.2%

Consumer Defensive

XRT
18.7%
FDIS
1.2%

Technology

XRT
2.7%
FDIS
1.0%

Communication Services

XRT
1.8%
FDIS
0.3%

Healthcare

XRT
1.6%
FDIS
0.1%

Energy

XRT
1.3%
FDIS

-

Basic Materials

XRT

-

FDIS

-

Financial Services

XRT

-

FDIS
0.1%

Industrials

XRT

-

FDIS
1.1%

Real Estate

XRT

-

FDIS
0.1%

Utilities

XRT

-

FDIS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XRT vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XRT
XRT Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
XRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRT Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XRT vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XRTFDISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.07

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

0.43

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.57

1.24

+1.34

XRT vs. FDIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XRT Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the FDIS Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XRT and FDIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XRT vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XRT drawdown since its inception was -65.81%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XRT and FDIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XRTFDISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.81%

-39.16%

-26.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.53%

-15.50%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.62%

-27.43%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.57%

-39.16%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.02%

-39.16%

-7.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.00%

-4.81%

-2.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.95%

-7.47%

-7.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.97%

5.36%

+0.61%

Volatility

XRT vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) is 6.04%, while Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a volatility of 6.64%. This indicates that XRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XRTFDISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

6.64%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.92%

14.66%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.84%

19.43%

+1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.89%

24.09%

+2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.20%

22.39%

+4.81%

XRT vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

XRT has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

XRT vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison

XRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than FDIS's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.73%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
0.75%0.77%1.52%1.40%2.15%1.55%1.01%1.57%1.51%1.52%1.36%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


XRT and FDIS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDIS has higher volatility (6.64%) compared to XRT (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XRT dropped -65.81% vs FDIS's -39.16%.

On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.50% vs 9.06% for XRT. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XRT has been the lower-risk option at 6.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.50% return vs 9.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XRT.

XRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.73% for FDIS.

XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry Index, while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XRT and 0.08% for FDIS.

XRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XRT and FDIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer