PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEJ vs. VCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEJ vs. VCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEJ achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly higher than VCR's 0.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PEJ has underperformed VCR with an annualized return of 6.65%, while VCR has yielded a comparatively higher 13.55% annualized return.


PEJ

1D
-1.32%
1M
3.10%
YTD
2.75%
6M
6.26%
1Y
17.69%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
6.65%

VCR

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
0.01%
6M
0.97%
1Y
11.24%
3Y*
15.28%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
13.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEJ vs. VCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEJ
Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF
2.75%17.78%25.08%15.73%-25.37%22.78%-10.29%13.82%-9.31%11.22%
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.01%5.77%24.27%40.38%-35.15%24.86%48.36%27.45%-2.31%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PEJ and VCR is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2005

0.81

The correlation between PEJ and VCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEJ vs. VCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEJ
PEJ Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
PEJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEJ Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PEJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

VCR
VCR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
VCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
VCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCR Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEJ vs. VCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEJVCRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

0.61

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.52

0.97

+0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.12

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.79

0.73

+1.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.65

2.28

+2.37

PEJ vs. VCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the VCR Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEJ and VCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEJVCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

0.61

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.27

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

0.61

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.51

-0.18

Drawdowns

PEJ vs. VCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEJ drawdown since its inception was -66.03%, which is greater than VCR's maximum drawdown of -61.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEJ and VCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEJVCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.03%

-61.54%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.29%

-15.59%

+5.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.75%

-27.36%

+1.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.44%

-39.20%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.96%

-39.20%

-19.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.53%

-4.54%

+3.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.32%

-9.40%

-2.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.96%

4.96%

-1.00%

Volatility

PEJ vs. VCR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) at 5.22%. This indicates that PEJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEJVCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.23%

5.22%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.85%

13.06%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.45%

18.46%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.79%

23.99%

-1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.75%

22.41%

+2.34%

PEJ vs. VCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEJ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VCR's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEJ vs. VCR - Dividend Comparison

PEJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than VCR's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEJ
Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF
0.39%0.24%0.40%0.46%0.43%0.34%0.92%0.39%0.78%0.68%0.68%0.52%
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.73%0.74%0.74%0.84%0.98%0.79%1.71%1.17%1.37%1.21%1.60%1.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEJ and VCR have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEJ has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to VCR (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEJ dropped -66.03% vs VCR's -61.54%.

On 10-year performance, VCR leads with 13.55% vs 6.65% for PEJ. On fees, VCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VCR has been the lower-risk option at 5.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VCR has performed better with a 13.55% return vs 6.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PEJ.

VCR has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.39% for PEJ.

PEJ tracks Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index, while VCR tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PEJ and 0.10% for VCR.

PEJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEJ and VCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer