PEJ vs. VCR
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR).
PEJ and VCR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PEJ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index. It was launched on Jun 23, 2005. VCR is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both PEJ and VCR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PEJ or VCR.
Key characteristics
PEJ | VCR | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 25.60% | 20.31% |
1Y Return | 42.07% | 37.88% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 0.53% | 2.42% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 4.71% | 16.14% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 5.05% | 14.09% |
Sharpe Ratio | 2.29 | 1.96 |
Sortino Ratio | 3.17 | 2.66 |
Omega Ratio | 1.40 | 1.33 |
Calmar Ratio | 1.29 | 1.48 |
Martin Ratio | 13.92 | 10.09 |
Ulcer Index | 2.91% | 3.50% |
Daily Std Dev | 17.73% | 18.00% |
Max Drawdown | -66.03% | -61.54% |
Current Drawdown | -2.67% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEJ and VCR is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PEJ vs. VCR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PEJ achieves a 25.60% return, which is significantly higher than VCR's 20.31% return. Over the past 10 years, PEJ has underperformed VCR with an annualized return of 5.05%, while VCR has yielded a comparatively higher 14.09% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PEJ vs. VCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEJ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VCR's 0.10% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PEJ vs. VCR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PEJ vs. VCR - Dividend Comparison
PEJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than VCR's 0.75% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.92% | 0.39% | 0.78% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.52% | 0.51% | 0.43% |
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.75% | 0.84% | 0.98% | 0.79% | 1.71% | 1.17% | 1.37% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
PEJ vs. VCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEJ drawdown since its inception was -66.03%, which is greater than VCR's maximum drawdown of -61.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEJ and VCR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PEJ vs. VCR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) is 5.12%, while Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) has a volatility of 5.72%. This indicates that PEJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.