PEJ vs. CHIQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

PEJ (Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF) and CHIQ (Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PEJ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index, while CHIQ is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEJ returned 7.51%/yr vs 6.65%/yr for CHIQ. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PEJ charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CHIQ.

Performance

PEJ vs. CHIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEJ achieves a 9.41% return, which is significantly higher than CHIQ's -11.44% return. Over the past 10 years, PEJ has outperformed CHIQ with an annualized return of 7.51%, while CHIQ has yielded a comparatively lower 6.65% annualized return.

PEJ

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -0.54%
• 6M: 11.47%
• YTD: 9.41%
• 1Y: 18.36%
• 3Y*: 16.45%
• 5Y*: 6.78%
• 10Y*: 7.51%
• ALL TIME*: 8.11%

CHIQ

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: 14.99%
• 6M: -10.92%
• YTD: -11.44%
• 1Y: -9.18%
• 3Y*: -1.44%
• 5Y*: -7.60%
• 10Y*: 6.65%
• ALL TIME*: 2.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF	$1.00M	$788.69K	$799.61K
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF	$2.30M	$2.56M	$2.67M

PEJ vs. CHIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF	9.41%	17.78%	25.08%	15.73%	-25.37%	22.78%	-10.29%	13.82%	-9.31%	11.22%
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF	-11.44%	13.69%	10.74%	-10.70%	-22.01%	-27.07%	92.61%	44.19%	-28.65%	67.74%

Correlation

The correlation between PEJ and CHIQ is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2009	0.47

The correlation between PEJ and CHIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PEJ vs. CHIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PEJ	CHIQ
Consumer Cyclical	59.9%	95.2%
Communication Services	23.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	8.3%	3.5%
Technology	5.1%	0.3%
Industrials	2.8%	0.3%
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PEJ vs. CHIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PEJ

PEJ Risk / Return Rank: 39
PEJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
PEJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
PEJ Omega Ratio Rank: 35
PEJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
PEJ Martin Ratio Rank: 40

CHIQ

CHIQ Risk / Return Rank: 6
CHIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
CHIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CHIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6
CHIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CHIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PEJ vs. CHIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PEJ	CHIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	-0.44	+1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	-0.49	+1.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	0.95	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	-0.29	+1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.23	-0.61	+4.85

PEJ vs. CHIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the CHIQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEJ and CHIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PEJ vs. CHIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEJ drawdown since its inception was -66.03%, roughly equal to the maximum CHIQ drawdown of -67.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEJ and CHIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEJ	CHIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.03%	-67.04%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.29%	-35.53%	+25.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.75%	-35.53%	+9.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.74%	-54.89%	+20.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.96%	-67.04%	+8.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.43%	-53.54%	+52.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.24%	-30.86%	+18.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.95%	16.72%	-12.77%

Volatility

PEJ vs. CHIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) is 4.73%, while Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) has a volatility of 6.67%. This indicates that PEJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PEJ	CHIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.73%	6.67%	-1.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.85%	16.80%	-1.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.67%	23.20%	-4.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.69%	37.29%	-14.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.72%	32.46%	-7.74%

PEJ vs. CHIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEJ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CHIQ's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEJ vs. CHIQ - Dividend Comparison

PEJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than CHIQ's 1.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF	1.52%	1.48%	2.65%	2.26%	0.38%	0.00%	0.11%	1.05%	2.71%	0.62%	1.51%	4.86%
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF	0.50%	0.24%	0.40%	0.46%	0.43%	0.34%	0.92%	0.39%	0.78%	0.68%	0.68%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEJ and CHIQ in my portfolio?

PEJ and CHIQ have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PEJ or CHIQ?

CHIQ has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to PEJ (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEJ dropped -66.03% vs CHIQ's -67.04%.

Which ETF is better, PEJ or CHIQ?

On 10-year performance, PEJ leads with 7.51% vs 6.65% for CHIQ. On fees, PEJ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PEJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PEJ or CHIQ?

Over the 10-year period, PEJ has performed better with a 7.51% return vs 6.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PEJ or CHIQ?

PEJ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CHIQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PEJ or CHIQ?

CHIQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.50% for PEJ.

What is the main difference between PEJ and CHIQ?

PEJ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while CHIQ is China Equities. PEJ tracks Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index, while CHIQ tracks MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PEJ and 0.65% for CHIQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PEJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.