PEJ vs. BEDZ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PEJ (Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF) and BEDZ (AdvisorShares Hotel ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. PEJ is passively managed, while BEDZ is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PEJ returned 4.94%/yr vs 8.86%/yr for BEDZ. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PEJ charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BEDZ.

Performance

PEJ vs. BEDZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEJ achieves a 6.08% return, which is significantly lower than BEDZ's 10.65% return.

PEJ

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: 7.11%
• YTD: 6.08%
• 6M: 4.61%
• 1Y: 20.09%
• 3Y*: 17.47%
• 5Y*: 4.94%
• 10Y*: 7.62%

BEDZ

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: 9.40%
• YTD: 10.65%
• 6M: 7.48%
• 1Y: 25.12%
• 3Y*: 16.24%
• 5Y*: 8.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEJ vs. BEDZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF	6.08%	17.78%	25.08%	15.73%	-25.37%	10.16%
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	10.65%	3.46%	18.31%	23.88%	-13.40%	7.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PEJ and BEDZ is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021	0.86

The correlation between PEJ and BEDZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

PEJ vs. BEDZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PEJ	BEDZ
Consumer Cyclical	59.4%	52.0%
Communication Services	30.1%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	7.8%	-
Technology	4.2%	-
Industrials	2.6%	3.9%
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	38.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PEJ vs. BEDZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEJ

PEJ Risk / Return Rank: 34
PEJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
PEJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
PEJ Omega Ratio Rank: 30
PEJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
PEJ Martin Ratio Rank: 35

BEDZ

BEDZ Risk / Return Rank: 37
BEDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
BEDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
BEDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
BEDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BEDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEJ vs. BEDZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PEJ	BEDZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	1.24	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	1.90	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.22	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	2.09	-0.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.08	4.91	+0.17

PEJ vs. BEDZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the BEDZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEJ and BEDZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PEJ vs. BEDZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEJ drawdown since its inception was -66.03%, which is greater than BEDZ's maximum drawdown of -29.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEJ and BEDZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEJ	BEDZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.03%	-29.70%	-36.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.29%	-12.06%	+1.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.75%	-28.31%	+2.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.74%	-29.70%	-5.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-1.07%	-0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.30%	-8.01%	-4.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.97%	5.13%	-1.16%

Volatility

PEJ vs. BEDZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) is 4.59%, while AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that PEJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEDZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PEJ	BEDZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.59%	4.98%	-0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.20%	15.25%	-1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.48%	20.43%	-1.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.77%	24.89%	-2.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.76%	24.79%	-0.03%

PEJ vs. BEDZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEJ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BEDZ's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEJ vs. BEDZ - Dividend Comparison

PEJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than BEDZ's 2.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	2.09%	2.31%	0.00%	1.67%	0.21%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF	0.52%	0.24%	0.40%	0.46%	0.43%	0.34%	0.92%	0.39%	0.78%	0.68%	0.68%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEJ and BEDZ in my portfolio?

PEJ and BEDZ have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PEJ or BEDZ?

BEDZ has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to PEJ (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEJ dropped -66.03% vs BEDZ's -29.70%.

Which ETF is better, PEJ or BEDZ?

On 5-year performance, BEDZ leads with 8.86% vs 4.94% for PEJ. On fees, PEJ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PEJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PEJ or BEDZ?

Over the 5-year period, BEDZ has performed better with a 8.86% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PEJ or BEDZ?

PEJ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEDZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PEJ or BEDZ?

BEDZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 0.52% for PEJ.

What is the main difference between PEJ and BEDZ?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PEJ and 0.99% for BEDZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BEDZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.