PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMH vs. FXD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMH vs. FXD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TMH

1D
-0.03%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FXD

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.79%
YTD
-1.88%
6M
-1.26%
1Y
9.00%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
3.00%
10Y*
7.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMH vs. FXD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TMH and FXD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMH vs. FXD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMH

FXD
FXD Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXD Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXD Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMH vs. FXD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TMH vs. FXD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMHFXDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-5.39

0.31

-5.70

Drawdowns

TMH vs. FXD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, smaller than the maximum FXD drawdown of -65.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and FXD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMHFXDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-65.27%

+59.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.59%

-7.12%

+1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-10.97%

+6.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

Volatility

TMH vs. FXD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMHFXDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.85%

19.21%

+1.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.85%

22.70%

-1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.85%

23.67%

-2.82%

TMH vs. FXD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FXD's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMH vs. FXD - Dividend Comparison

TMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
0.78%0.80%0.89%0.70%1.00%0.62%0.42%0.92%1.08%0.93%1.05%0.90%
TMH
Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMH and FXD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXD.

FXD has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.00% for TMH.

TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while FXD tracks StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.63% for FXD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMH and FXD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer