FXD vs. RTH
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH).
FXD and RTH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FXD is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index. It was launched on May 8, 2007. RTH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Retail 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both FXD and RTH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FXD or RTH.
Correlation
The correlation between FXD and RTH is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FXD vs. RTH - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FXD:
0.65
RTH:
1.83
FXD:
1.01
RTH:
2.54
FXD:
1.12
RTH:
1.32
FXD:
0.91
RTH:
2.92
FXD:
2.23
RTH:
7.49
FXD:
4.99%
RTH:
2.97%
FXD:
17.05%
RTH:
12.21%
FXD:
-65.27%
RTH:
-41.80%
FXD:
-5.95%
RTH:
-4.66%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXD achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly lower than RTH's 21.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FXD has underperformed RTH with an annualized return of 7.15%, while RTH has yielded a comparatively higher 13.76% annualized return.
FXD
9.92%
-0.34%
7.53%
9.49%
8.01%
7.15%
RTH
21.01%
1.61%
9.86%
21.51%
14.60%
13.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FXD vs. RTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than RTH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FXD vs. RTH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FXD vs. RTH - Dividend Comparison
FXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while RTH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXD First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund | 0.83% | 0.70% | 1.00% | 0.62% | 0.42% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 0.93% | 1.05% | 0.91% | 0.52% | 0.35% |
RTH VanEck Vectors Retail ETF | 0.00% | 1.07% | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.64% | 0.91% | 1.05% | 1.56% | 1.84% | 2.25% | 0.41% | 1.00% |
Drawdowns
FXD vs. RTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXD drawdown since its inception was -65.27%, which is greater than RTH's maximum drawdown of -41.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXD and RTH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FXD vs. RTH - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to VanEck Vectors Retail ETF (RTH) at 4.12%. This indicates that FXD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.