FXD vs. FDIS
FXD (First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund) and FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - FXD tracks the StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index while FDIS tracks the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FXD returned 7.83%/yr vs 13.47%/yr for FDIS. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FXD charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FDIS.
Performance
FXD vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FXD achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly higher than FDIS's 0.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FXD has underperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 7.83%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.47% annualized return.
FXD
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- 6M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- 5.46%
- 3Y*
- 7.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.59%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
FDIS
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- -4.49%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 7.06%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.47%
FXD vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXD First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund | 0.64% | 6.70% | 10.57% | 23.39% | -21.56% | 22.72% | 12.97% | 24.22% | -11.60% | 19.77% |
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.09% | 5.67% | 24.43% | 40.48% | -35.23% | 24.25% | 49.50% | 27.44% | -0.88% | 22.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXD and FDIS is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.87 |
The correlation between FXD and FDIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
FXD vs. FDIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FXD
FDIS
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
Technology
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
FXD
FDIS
Consumer Defensive
FXD
FDIS
Industrials
FXD
FDIS
Communication Services
FXD
FDIS
Technology
FXD
FDIS
Energy
FXD
FDIS
-
Basic Materials
FXD
-
FDIS
-
Financial Services
FXD
-
FDIS
Healthcare
FXD
-
FDIS
Real Estate
FXD
-
FDIS
Utilities
FXD
-
FDIS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FXD vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank
FXD
FDIS
FXD vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FXD | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.08 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 0.46 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.96 | 1.37 | -0.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FXD vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXD drawdown since its inception was -65.27%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXD and FDIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FXD | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.27% | -39.16% | -26.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.94% | -15.50% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.02% | -27.43% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.74% | -39.16% | +5.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.54% | -39.16% | -10.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.74% | -4.50% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.93% | -7.47% | -3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.68% | 5.16% | +0.52% |
Volatility
FXD vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) have volatilities of 6.05% and 6.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FXD | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | 6.22% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.92% | 14.02% | +0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.56% | 18.85% | +0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 24.03% | -1.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.68% | 22.32% | +1.36% |
FXD vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
FXD vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison
FXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than FDIS's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.73% | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% |
FXD First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.89% | 0.70% | 1.00% | 0.62% | 0.42% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 0.93% | 1.05% | 0.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FXD and FDIS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDIS has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to FXD (6.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXD dropped -65.27% vs FDIS's -39.16%.
On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.47% vs 7.83% for FXD. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FXD has been the lower-risk option at 6.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.47% return vs 7.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXD.
FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.62% for FXD.
FXD tracks StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index, while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXD and 0.08% for FDIS.
FDIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FXD and FDIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer