PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXD vs. FDIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXD vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXD achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly higher than FDIS's -1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FXD has underperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 8.50%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.


FXD

1D
-0.99%
1M
3.43%
YTD
0.15%
6M
-1.79%
1Y
11.85%
3Y*
9.82%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
8.50%

FDIS

1D
-1.74%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
-1.40%
6M
-3.81%
1Y
11.16%
3Y*
12.93%
5Y*
5.44%
10Y*
13.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXD vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
0.15%6.70%10.57%23.39%-21.56%22.72%12.97%24.22%-11.60%19.77%
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
-1.40%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FXD and FDIS is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.87

The correlation between FXD and FDIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXD vs. FDIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXD
FDIS

Consumer Cyclical

69.7%
96.7%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
1.1%

Industrials

9.2%
0.9%

Communication Services

6.7%
0.3%

Technology

2.5%
1.0%

Energy

0.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

FXD
69.7%
FDIS
96.7%

Consumer Defensive

FXD
9.2%
FDIS
1.1%

Industrials

FXD
9.2%
FDIS
0.9%

Communication Services

FXD
6.7%
FDIS
0.3%

Technology

FXD
2.5%
FDIS
1.0%

Energy

FXD
0.8%
FDIS

-

Basic Materials

FXD

-

FDIS

-

Financial Services

FXD

-

FDIS
0.1%

Healthcare

FXD

-

FDIS
0.1%

Real Estate

FXD

-

FDIS
0.1%

Utilities

FXD

-

FDIS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXD vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXD
FXD Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
FXD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXD Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FXD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXD Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXD vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FXDFDISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.11

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.72

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.12

2.21

-0.09

FXD vs. FDIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXD Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is comparable to the FDIS Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXD and FDIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FXD vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXD drawdown since its inception was -65.27%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXD and FDIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXDFDISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.27%

-39.16%

-26.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.94%

-15.50%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.02%

-27.43%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.74%

-39.16%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

-39.16%

-10.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.20%

-5.93%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.95%

-7.49%

-3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.59%

5.05%

+0.54%

Volatility

FXD vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund (FXD) is 5.75%, while Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that FXD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXDFDISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

6.33%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.77%

13.87%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.52%

18.76%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.77%

23.98%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.72%

22.36%

+1.36%

FXD vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXD has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXD vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison

FXD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than FDIS's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.74%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
FXD
First Trust Consumer Discretionary AlphaDEX Fund
0.76%0.80%0.89%0.70%1.00%0.62%0.42%0.92%1.08%0.93%1.05%0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXD and FDIS have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDIS has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to FXD (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXD dropped -65.27% vs FDIS's -39.16%.

On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.99% vs 8.50% for FXD. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FXD has been the lower-risk option at 5.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 8.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for FXD.

FXD has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.74% for FDIS.

FXD tracks StrataQuant Consumer Discretionary Index, while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for FXD and 0.08% for FDIS.

FXD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXD and FDIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer