TMH vs. EATZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. TMH is passively managed, while EATZ is actively managed. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.

Performance

TMH vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TMH

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EATZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 4.80%
• 6M: 3.18%
• 1Y: -6.88%
• 3Y*: 10.53%
• 5Y*: 2.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMH vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged	-5.59%
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

TMH vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EATZ

EATZ Risk / Return Rank: 10
EATZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Omega Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
EATZ Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMH vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMH	EATZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.10	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-5.39	0.12	-5.51

Drawdowns

TMH vs. EATZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, smaller than the maximum EATZ drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and EATZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMH	EATZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.59%	-34.40%	+28.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-23.21%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.21%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.59%	-13.56%	+7.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.22%	-13.40%	+9.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	12.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TMH	EATZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.91%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.48%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.85%	18.81%	+2.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.85%	21.65%	-0.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.85%	21.60%	-0.75%

TMH vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMH vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

TMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF	0.48%	0.50%	0.18%	0.49%	2.35%	0.15%
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, TMH or EATZ?

On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMH or EATZ?

TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMH or EATZ?

EATZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for TMH.

What is the main difference between TMH and EATZ?

They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 1.00% for EATZ.