TMH vs. EATZ
TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. TMH is passively managed, while EATZ is actively managed. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EATZ.
Performance
TMH vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMH
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EATZ
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMH vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -9.71% |
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMH vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMH vs. EATZ - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMH | EATZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.20% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.78% | — | — |
Volatility
TMH vs. EATZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMH | EATZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.94% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.94% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.94% | — | — |
TMH vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMH vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison
TMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than EATZ's 0.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF | 0.48% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.49% | 2.35% | 0.15% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 5.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 5.28%, compared with 0.48% for EATZ.
They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 1.00% for EATZ.
Find the right allocation for TMH and EATZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer