EATZ vs. VOO
EATZ (AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EATZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. EATZ is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EATZ charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
EATZ vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EATZ
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.77%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
EATZ vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF | 4.80% | -6.67% | 23.21% | 25.23% | -20.68% | -4.90% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.75% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 16.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between EATZ and VOO is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021 | 0.64 |
The correlation between EATZ and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EATZ vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EATZ
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
EATZ
VOO
Consumer Defensive
EATZ
VOO
Industrials
EATZ
VOO
Communication Services
EATZ
VOO
Basic Materials
EATZ
-
VOO
Energy
EATZ
-
VOO
Financial Services
EATZ
-
VOO
Healthcare
EATZ
-
VOO
Real Estate
EATZ
-
VOO
Technology
EATZ
-
VOO
Utilities
EATZ
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EATZ vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
EATZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VOO
EATZ vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EATZ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EATZ vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EATZ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -33.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.74% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -3.68% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.98% | — |
Volatility
EATZ vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EATZ | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.73% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 12.39% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 16.90% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 18.05% | — |
EATZ vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EATZ has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
EATZ vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than VOO's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EATZ AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF | 0.48% | 0.50% | 0.18% | 0.49% | 2.35% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.04% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EATZ and VOO have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.48% for EATZ.
EATZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for EATZ and 0.03% for VOO.
Find the right allocation for EATZ and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer