PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EATZ vs. IRBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EATZ vs. IRBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


EATZ

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IRBO

1D
0.66%
1M
15.54%
YTD
64.94%
6M
64.94%
1Y
106.73%
3Y*
35.95%
5Y*
13.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EATZ vs. IRBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
4.80%-6.67%23.21%25.23%-20.68%-4.90%
IRBO
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
64.94%29.97%8.02%36.37%-37.89%-1.49%

Correlation

The correlation between EATZ and IRBO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between EATZ and IRBO has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EATZ vs. IRBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EATZ
IRBO

Consumer Cyclical

78.2%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

16.9%
0.0%

Industrials

4.9%
4.7%

Communication Services

2.3%
5.5%

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Technology

-

83.8%

Utilities

-

3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EATZ
78.2%
IRBO
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

EATZ
16.9%
IRBO
0.0%

Industrials

EATZ
4.9%
IRBO
4.7%

Communication Services

EATZ
2.3%
IRBO
5.5%

Basic Materials

EATZ

-

IRBO

-

Energy

EATZ

-

IRBO

-

Financial Services

EATZ

-

IRBO

-

Healthcare

EATZ

-

IRBO
0.0%

Real Estate

EATZ

-

IRBO
1.2%

Technology

EATZ

-

IRBO
83.8%

Utilities

EATZ

-

IRBO
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EATZ vs. IRBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EATZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


IRBO
IRBO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IRBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRBO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IRBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRBO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EATZ vs. IRBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and iShares Future AI & Tech ETF (IRBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EATZIRBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.73

EATZ vs. IRBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EATZ vs. IRBO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EATZIRBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.72%

Volatility

EATZ vs. IRBO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EATZIRBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.21%

EATZ vs. IRBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EATZ has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than IRBO's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

EATZ vs. IRBO - Dividend Comparison

EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than IRBO's 0.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
0.48%0.50%0.18%0.49%2.35%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IRBO
iShares Future AI & Tech ETF
0.05%0.00%0.50%0.88%0.75%2.41%0.53%0.69%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


EATZ and IRBO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IRBO is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IRBO is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for EATZ.

EATZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.05% for IRBO.

EATZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while IRBO is Robotics. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for EATZ and 0.47% for IRBO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EATZ and IRBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer