PortfoliosLab logo
EATZ vs. IRBO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EATZ and IRBO is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

EATZ vs. IRBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF (IRBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


EATZ

YTD

5.12%

1M

11.21%

6M

-1.96%

1Y

22.79%

3Y*

16.76%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

IRBO

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EATZ vs. IRBO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EATZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than IRBO's 0.47% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EATZ vs. IRBO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EATZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EATZ is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EATZ is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EATZ is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EATZ is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EATZ is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EATZ is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

IRBO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IRBO is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IRBO is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IRBO is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IRBO is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IRBO is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IRBO is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EATZ vs. IRBO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) and iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF (IRBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

EATZ vs. IRBO - Dividend Comparison

EATZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, while IRBO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
0.17%0.18%0.49%2.35%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IRBO
iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF
0.35%0.35%0.62%0.13%1.14%0.53%0.69%0.34%

Drawdowns

EATZ vs. IRBO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

EATZ vs. IRBO - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...