TMH vs. DABS
TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and DABS (DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMH is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while DABS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by DoubleLine. TMH is passively managed, while DABS is actively managed. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for DABS.
Performance
TMH vs. DABS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMH
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DABS
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 5.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMH vs. DABS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -5.59% |
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF | -0.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMH and DABS is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMH vs. DABS — Risk / Return Rank
TMH
DABS
TMH vs. DABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMH | DABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -5.39 | 2.05 | -7.44 |
Drawdowns
TMH vs. DABS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, which is greater than DABS's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and DABS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMH | DABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.59% | -1.47% | -4.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.59% | -0.49% | -5.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -0.31% | -3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.37% | — |
Volatility
TMH vs. DABS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMH | DABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.85% | 2.49% | +18.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 2.56% | +18.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 2.56% | +18.29% |
TMH vs. DABS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DABS's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMH vs. DABS - Dividend Comparison
TMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 4.89% | 3.81% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMH and DABS have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DABS.
DABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 0.00% for TMH.
TMH is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while DABS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.40% for DABS.
Find the right allocation for TMH and DABS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer