PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMH vs. DABS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMH vs. DABS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TMH

1D
-0.03%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DABS

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.88%
6M
1.22%
1Y
5.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMH vs. DABS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TMH and DABS is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

-1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMH vs. DABS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMH

DABS
DABS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DABS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DABS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMH vs. DABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TMH vs. DABS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMHDABSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-5.39

2.05

-7.44

Drawdowns

TMH vs. DABS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, which is greater than DABS's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and DABS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMHDABSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-1.47%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.59%

-0.49%

-5.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-0.31%

-3.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

Volatility

TMH vs. DABS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMHDABSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.85%

2.49%

+18.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.85%

2.56%

+18.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.85%

2.56%

+18.29%

TMH vs. DABS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DABS's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMH vs. DABS - Dividend Comparison

TMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TMH and DABS have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DABS.

DABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 0.00% for TMH.

TMH is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while DABS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.40% for DABS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMH and DABS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer