TMH vs. DABS

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and DABS (DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMH is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while DABS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by DoubleLine. TMH is passively managed, while DABS is actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for DABS.

Performance

TMH vs. DABS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TMH

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DABS

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 6M: 1.55%
• 1Y: 5.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMH vs. DABS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged	-9.14%
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF	0.49%

Correlation

The correlation between TMH and DABS is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.54

Return for Risk

TMH vs. DABS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DABS

DABS Risk / Return Rank: 80
DABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
DABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
DABS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
DABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
DABS Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMH vs. DABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMH	DABS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.07	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.20	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.42	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.95	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	13.47	—

Drawdowns

TMH vs. DABS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, which is greater than DABS's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and DABS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMH	DABS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.20%	-1.47%	-8.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.63%	0.00%	-9.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.98%	-0.30%	-5.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.38%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TMH	DABS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.74%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	1.68%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.57%	2.47%	+23.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.57%	2.56%	+23.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.57%	2.56%	+23.01%

TMH vs. DABS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DABS's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMH vs. DABS - Dividend Comparison

TMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, more than DABS's 4.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF	4.86%	3.81%
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged	5.24%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMH and DABS in my portfolio?

TMH and DABS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TMH or DABS?

On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMH or DABS?

TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DABS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMH or DABS?

TMH has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 4.86% for DABS.

What is the main difference between TMH and DABS?

TMH is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while DABS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.40% for DABS.