DABS vs. DMX
DABS (DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF) and DMX (DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DABS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by DoubleLine, while DMX is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by DoubleLine. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DABS returned 5.14% vs 6.27% for DMX. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DABS charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DMX.
Performance
DABS vs. DMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DABS achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than DMX's 1.65% return.
DABS
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 6.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DABS vs. DMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 1.11% | 5.63% |
DMX DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF | 1.65% | 5.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between DABS and DMX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025 | 0.29 |
The correlation between DABS and DMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DABS vs. DMX — Risk / Return Rank
DABS
DMX
DABS vs. DMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF (DMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DABS | DMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.57 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 4.90 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.65 | 20.32 | -6.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DABS vs. DMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DABS drawdown since its inception was -1.47%, smaller than the maximum DMX drawdown of -2.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DABS and DMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DABS | DMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -2.65% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.29% | -1.28% | -0.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.28% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -0.24% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.38% | 0.31% | +0.07% |
Volatility
DABS vs. DMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) is 0.67%, while DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF (DMX) has a volatility of 0.89%. This indicates that DABS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DABS | DMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.67% | 0.89% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.66% | 1.74% | -0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46% | 2.35% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.56% | 3.12% | -0.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.56% | 3.12% | -0.56% |
DABS vs. DMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DABS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DMX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
DABS vs. DMX - Dividend Comparison
DABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than DMX's 5.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 4.88% | 3.81% | 0.00% |
DMX DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF | 5.89% | 5.96% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DABS and DMX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DMX has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to DABS (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DABS dropped -1.47% vs DMX's -2.65%.
On 1-year performance, DMX leads with 6.27% vs 5.14% for DABS. On fees, DABS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DABS has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DMX has performed better with a 6.27% return vs 5.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DABS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DMX.
DMX has the higher dividend yield at 5.89%, compared with 4.88% for DABS.
DABS is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while DMX is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DABS and 0.50% for DMX.
DMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DABS and DMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer