PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DABS vs. DMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DABS vs. DMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DABS achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly higher than DMBS's 0.63% return.


DABS

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.39%
1Y
5.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DMBS

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.86%
YTD
0.63%
6M
0.75%
1Y
6.19%
3Y*
4.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DABS vs. DMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DABS and DMBS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025

0.74

The correlation between DABS and DMBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DABS vs. DMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DABS
DABS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DABS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DABS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DABS Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DABS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DABS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

DMBS
DMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
DMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
DMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DABS vs. DMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DABSDMBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.27

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

1.94

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.65

6.45

+7.20

DABS vs. DMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DABS Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the DMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DABS and DMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DABS vs. DMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DABS drawdown since its inception was -1.47%, smaller than the maximum DMBS drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DABS and DMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DABSDMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-8.14%

+6.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-3.20%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.26%

-1.47%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-1.70%

+1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

0.96%

-0.58%

Volatility

DABS vs. DMBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) is 0.67%, while Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) has a volatility of 1.26%. This indicates that DABS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DABSDMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

1.26%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.66%

3.14%

-1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46%

4.15%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.56%

6.25%

-3.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.56%

6.25%

-3.69%

DABS vs. DMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DABS has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than DMBS's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

DABS vs. DMBS - Dividend Comparison

DABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than DMBS's 5.11% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DABS
DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF
4.88%3.81%0.00%0.00%
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
5.11%4.96%4.97%2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


DABS and DMBS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMBS has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to DABS (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DABS dropped -1.47% vs DMBS's -8.14%.

On 1-year performance, DMBS leads with 6.19% vs 5.14% for DABS. On fees, DABS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, DABS has been the lower-risk option at 0.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DMBS has performed better with a 6.19% return vs 5.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DABS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DMBS.

DMBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 4.88% for DABS.

DABS is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while DMBS is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DABS and 0.49% for DMBS.

DABS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DABS and DMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer