TMH vs. AGZD
TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and AGZD (WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TMH is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while AGZD is a Nontraditional Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Zero Duration. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.33, they often move in opposite directions. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for AGZD.
Performance
TMH vs. AGZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMH
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AGZD
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 5.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.78%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- 3.26%
TMH vs. AGZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -9.14% |
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMH and AGZD is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | -0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMH vs. AGZD — Risk / Return Rank
TMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AGZD
TMH vs. AGZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMH | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.80 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 22.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMH vs. AGZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, which is greater than AGZD's maximum drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and AGZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMH | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -8.46% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.63% | -0.58% | -9.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -0.77% | -5.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility
TMH vs. AGZD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMH | AGZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.14% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.57% | 2.83% | +22.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.57% | 3.60% | +21.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.57% | 3.72% | +21.85% |
TMH vs. AGZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than AGZD's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TMH vs. AGZD - Dividend Comparison
TMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, more than AGZD's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGZD WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund | 3.99% | 4.12% | 3.96% | 6.07% | 8.61% | 1.66% | 2.28% | 2.83% | 2.62% | 2.31% | 1.81% | 1.66% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 5.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMH and AGZD have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for AGZD.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 3.99% for AGZD.
TMH is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while AGZD is Nontraditional Bonds. TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while AGZD tracks Bloomberg Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, Zero Duration. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.23% for AGZD.
Find the right allocation for TMH and AGZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer