PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AGZD vs. EMNT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AGZD vs. EMNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AGZD achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly higher than EMNT's 1.65% return.


AGZD

1D
0.05%
1M
0.73%
YTD
2.40%
6M
3.10%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
3.17%

EMNT

1D
0.02%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.65%
6M
2.02%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5.25%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AGZD vs. EMNT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AGZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund
2.40%4.35%6.64%7.15%1.17%0.69%0.31%0.17%
EMNT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF
1.65%4.74%5.79%5.84%-0.57%0.11%2.08%0.09%

Correlation

The correlation between AGZD and EMNT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2019

-0.05

The correlation between AGZD and EMNT shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (5 years) to 0.05 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AGZD vs. EMNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AGZD
AGZD Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AGZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGZD Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
AGZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGZD Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

EMNT
EMNT Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
EMNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMNT Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
EMNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMNT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AGZD vs. EMNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AGZDEMNTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

10.65

-8.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.79

21.23

-18.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

5.66

-4.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.28

33.62

-27.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.78

237.85

-218.06

AGZD vs. EMNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AGZD Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the EMNT Sharpe Ratio of 10.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AGZD and EMNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AGZDEMNTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

10.65

-8.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.22

4.18

-2.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

3.51

-2.87

Drawdowns

AGZD vs. EMNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AGZD drawdown since its inception was -8.46%, which is greater than EMNT's maximum drawdown of -2.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGZD and EMNT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AGZDEMNTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.46%

-2.28%

-6.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.87%

-0.13%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.71%

-0.73%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.23%

-1.70%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

0.00%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-0.23%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.02%

+0.26%

Volatility

AGZD vs. EMNT - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (AGZD) has a higher volatility of 1.02% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF (EMNT) at 0.16%. This indicates that AGZD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AGZDEMNTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

0.16%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.99%

0.34%

+1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88%

0.41%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.58%

0.83%

+2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.72%

0.86%

+2.86%

AGZD vs. EMNT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AGZD has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than EMNT's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AGZD vs. EMNT - Dividend Comparison

AGZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, which matches EMNT's 4.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AGZD
WisdomTree Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund
3.98%4.12%3.96%6.07%8.61%1.66%2.28%2.83%2.62%2.31%1.81%1.66%
EMNT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ESG ETF
4.00%4.46%5.14%4.62%2.79%0.66%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AGZD and EMNT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AGZD has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to EMNT (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AGZD dropped -8.46% vs EMNT's -2.28%.

On 5-year performance, AGZD leads with 4.37% vs 3.43% for EMNT. On fees, AGZD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, EMNT has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AGZD has performed better with a 4.37% return vs 3.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AGZD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for EMNT.

EMNT has the higher dividend yield at 4.00%, compared with 3.98% for AGZD.

AGZD is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while EMNT is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for AGZD and 0.24% for EMNT.

EMNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.65 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AGZD and EMNT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer