TMFC vs. MFIG
TMFC (Motley Fool 100 Index ETF) and MFIG (Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Motley Fool - TMFC tracks the Motley Fool 100 Index while MFIG tracks the Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
TMFC vs. MFIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFC achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly higher than MFIG's -0.33% return.
TMFC
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- 4.32%
- 6M
- 3.34%
- 1Y
- 20.43%
- 3Y*
- 23.57%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- —
MFIG
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -2.41%
- YTD
- -0.33%
- 6M
- -1.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFC vs. MFIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | 4.32% | -0.42% |
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | -0.33% | -0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFC and MFIG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFC vs. MFIG — Risk / Return Rank
TMFC
MFIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TMFC vs. MFIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMFC | MFIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.87 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMFC vs. MFIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFC drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, which is greater than MFIG's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFC and MFIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFC | MFIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.06% | -14.29% | -18.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.87% | -6.50% | +1.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.75% | -4.61% | -2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | — | — |
Volatility
TMFC vs. MFIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFC | MFIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.27% | 17.10% | -2.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 17.10% | +3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.00% | 17.10% | +4.90% |
TMFC vs. MFIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TMFC and MFIG have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
TMFC vs. MFIG - Dividend Comparison
TMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while MFIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | 0.14% | 0.14% | 0.40% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.50% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFC and MFIG have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMFC and MFIG have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
TMFC has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for MFIG.
TMFC tracks Motley Fool 100 Index, while MFIG tracks Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index.
Find the right allocation for TMFC and MFIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer