TMFC vs. BUL
Compare and contrast key facts about Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL).
TMFC and BUL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TMFC is a passively managed fund by Motley Fool that tracks the performance of the Motley Fool 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2018. BUL is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index. It was launched on May 2, 2019. Both TMFC and BUL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TMFC vs. BUL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMFC vs. BUL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | -7.36% | 19.55% | 35.17% | 47.04% | -30.86% | 25.30% | 42.00% | 11.42% |
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF | -0.64% | 19.18% | 27.39% | 3.68% | -16.18% | 32.48% | 27.26% | 4.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFC achieves a -7.36% return, which is significantly lower than BUL's -0.64% return.
TMFC
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -4.14%
- YTD
- -7.36%
- 6M
- -5.59%
- 1Y
- 18.84%
- 3Y*
- 23.68%
- 5Y*
- 13.26%
- 10Y*
- —
BUL
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -4.08%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 3.80%
- 1Y
- 25.03%
- 3Y*
- 17.35%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMFC vs. BUL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BUL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMFC vs. BUL — Risk / Return Rank
TMFC
BUL
TMFC vs. BUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFC | BUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 1.08 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 1.70 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.23 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 1.83 | -0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.50 | 8.06 | -2.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFC | BUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.08 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.43 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.53 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFC and BUL is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TMFC vs. BUL - Dividend Comparison
TMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than BUL's 0.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | 0.15% | 0.14% | 0.40% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.50% | 0.61% |
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF | 0.25% | 0.28% | 0.30% | 2.11% | 0.67% | 0.08% | 0.69% | 0.81% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TMFC vs. BUL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFC drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, smaller than the maximum BUL drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFC and BUL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFC | BUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.06% | -37.08% | +4.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.64% | -13.57% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.06% | -27.85% | -5.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.24% | -4.90% | -4.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.88% | -7.79% | +0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 3.09% | +0.50% |
Volatility
TMFC vs. BUL - Volatility Comparison
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) have volatilities of 5.84% and 6.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMFC | BUL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.84% | 6.10% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.54% | 12.11% | -1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.22% | 23.20% | -2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.42% | 21.77% | -1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.14% | 24.39% | -2.25% |