BUL vs. AOTG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG).

BUL and AOTG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BUL is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index. It was launched on May 2, 2019. AOTG is an actively managed fund by AOT. It was launched on Jun 28, 2022.

Performance

BUL vs. AOTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BUL vs. AOTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF	-0.64%	19.18%	27.39%	3.68%	10.21%
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF	-14.12%	25.26%	32.20%	54.58%	-11.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BUL achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly higher than AOTG's -14.12% return.

BUL

• 1D: 1.26%
• 1M: -4.08%
• YTD: -0.64%
• 6M: 3.80%
• 1Y: 25.03%
• 3Y*: 17.35%
• 5Y*: 9.31%
• 10Y*: —

AOTG

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -3.71%
• YTD: -14.12%
• 6M: -11.94%
• 1Y: 21.37%
• 3Y*: 21.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BUL vs. AOTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AOTG's 0.75% expense ratio.

AOTG

AOT Growth and Innovation ETF

BUL

Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF

Return for Risk

BUL vs. AOTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BUL

BUL Risk / Return Rank: 65
BUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
BUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
BUL Omega Ratio Rank: 60
BUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BUL Martin Ratio Rank: 73

AOTG

AOTG Risk / Return Rank: 37
AOTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
AOTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
AOTG Omega Ratio Rank: 38
AOTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
AOTG Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BUL vs. AOTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BUL	AOTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	0.74	+0.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	1.21	+0.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.16	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.83	0.99	+0.85
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.06	3.03	+5.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BUL vs. AOTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the AOTG Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUL and AOTG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BUL	AOTG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.08	0.74	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.66	-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between BUL and AOTG is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BUL vs. AOTG - Dividend Comparison

BUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, while AOTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF	0.25%	0.28%	0.30%	2.11%	0.67%	0.08%	0.69%	0.81%
AOTG AOT Growth and Innovation ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BUL vs. AOTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUL drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, which is greater than AOTG's maximum drawdown of -31.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUL and AOTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUL	AOTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.08%	-31.63%	-5.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.57%	-22.85%	+9.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.90%	-18.68%	+13.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.79%	-8.00%	+0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	7.46%	-4.37%

Volatility

BUL vs. AOTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) is 6.10%, while AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) has a volatility of 9.04%. This indicates that BUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUL	AOTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.10%	9.04%	-2.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.11%	19.04%	-6.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.20%	29.09%	-5.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.77%	29.40%	-7.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.39%	29.40%	-5.01%