BUL vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
BUL and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BUL is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer Cash Cows Growth Index. It was launched on May 2, 2019. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. Both BUL and COWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BUL or COWZ.
Key characteristics
| BUL | COWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 32.70% | 16.47% |
| 1Y Return | 41.42% | 25.84% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.06% | 10.24% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.19% | 16.92% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.44 | 1.88 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.25 | 2.72 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.40 | 1.33 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.19 | 3.40 |
| Martin Ratio | 16.51 | 8.07 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.52% | 3.19% |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.08% | 13.70% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.08% | -38.63% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.08% | -0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between BUL and COWZ is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BUL vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BUL achieves a 32.70% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 16.47% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BUL vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BUL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BUL vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BUL vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
BUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than COWZ's 1.83% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF | 0.71% | 2.11% | 0.66% | 0.08% | 0.69% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.83% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
BUL vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BUL drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, roughly equal to the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUL and COWZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BUL vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 4.08%. This indicates that BUL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.