BUL vs. COWZ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

BUL (Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BUL is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BUL returned 10.23%/yr vs 11.04%/yr for COWZ. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BUL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.

Performance

BUL vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BUL having a 12.10% return and COWZ slightly higher at 12.39%.

BUL

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 2.69%
• 6M: 8.67%
• YTD: 12.10%
• 1Y: 22.79%
• 3Y*: 20.03%
• 5Y*: 10.23%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.16%

COWZ

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 5.50%
• 6M: 8.21%
• YTD: 12.39%
• 1Y: 24.54%
• 3Y*: 11.99%
• 5Y*: 11.04%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF	$436.05K	$379.45K	$479.01K
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	$63.88M	$58.45M	$60.21M

BUL vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF	12.10%	19.18%	27.39%	3.68%	-16.18%	32.48%	27.26%	4.81%
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	12.39%	8.98%	10.64%	14.73%	0.19%	42.57%	11.65%	6.99%

Correlation

The correlation between BUL and COWZ is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2019	0.80

The correlation between BUL and COWZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

BUL vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BUL	COWZ
Consumer Cyclical	28.2%	14.3%
Healthcare	27.8%	19.9%
Technology	21.9%	22.9%
Basic Materials	9.1%	4.0%
Energy	5.5%	11.2%
Industrials	3.2%	8.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	10.6%
Communication Services	1.5%	8.8%
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BUL vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BUL

BUL Risk / Return Rank: 61
BUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BUL Omega Ratio Rank: 51
BUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
BUL Martin Ratio Rank: 70

COWZ

COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 87
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 85
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BUL vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BUL	COWZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	2.09	-0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	3.08	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.37	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	4.14	-1.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.02	12.12	-3.10

BUL vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BUL Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BUL and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BUL vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BUL drawdown since its inception was -37.08%, roughly equal to the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BUL and COWZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BUL	COWZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.08%	-38.63%	+1.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	-5.95%	-2.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.55%	-22.00%	-1.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.85%	-22.00%	-5.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.83%	+0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.52%	-4.76%	-2.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	2.03%	+0.50%

Volatility

BUL vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL) is 4.17%, while Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that BUL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BUL	COWZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.17%	4.86%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.83%	8.75%	+4.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.93%	11.84%	+5.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.91%	17.69%	+4.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.11%	19.86%	+4.25%

BUL vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BUL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

BUL vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

BUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than COWZ's 1.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BUL Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF	0.21%	0.28%	0.30%	2.11%	0.67%	0.08%	0.69%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	1.84%	2.19%	1.82%	1.92%	1.96%	1.48%	2.54%	1.96%	1.67%	1.95%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BUL and COWZ in my portfolio?

BUL and COWZ have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BUL or COWZ?

COWZ has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to BUL (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BUL dropped -37.08% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

Which ETF is better, BUL or COWZ?

On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 11.04% vs 10.23% for BUL. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, BUL has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BUL or COWZ?

Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 11.04% return vs 10.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BUL or COWZ?

COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BUL or COWZ?

COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 0.21% for BUL.

What is the main difference between BUL and COWZ?

BUL is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. BUL tracks Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BUL and 0.49% for COWZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.