TMF vs. QQQ
TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TMF returned -17.04%/yr vs 21.59%/yr for QQQ. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. TMF charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
TMF vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMF achieves a -8.42% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.71% return. Over the past 10 years, TMF has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of -17.04%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.59% annualized return.
TMF
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -8.42%
- 6M
- -10.21%
- 1Y
- -2.46%
- 3Y*
- -21.29%
- 5Y*
- -31.41%
- 10Y*
- -17.04%
QQQ
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 16.71%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 35.78%
- 3Y*
- 27.15%
- 5Y*
- 16.98%
- 10Y*
- 21.59%
TMF vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -8.42% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.71% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMF and QQQ is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2009 | -0.19 |
The correlation between TMF and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TMF vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMF
QQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
TMF
QQQ
Basic Materials
TMF
-
QQQ
Communication Services
TMF
-
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
TMF
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
TMF
-
QQQ
Energy
TMF
-
QQQ
Healthcare
TMF
-
QQQ
Industrials
TMF
-
QQQ
Real Estate
TMF
-
QQQ
Technology
TMF
-
QQQ
Utilities
TMF
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMF vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
TMF
QQQ
TMF vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMF | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.38 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 3.00 | -3.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.21 | 11.43 | -11.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMF | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | 2.15 | -2.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.68 | 0.76 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.39 | 0.97 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.14 | 0.40 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
TMF vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMF drawdown since its inception was -92.89%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMF and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMF | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.89% | -82.97% | -9.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | -11.96% | -14.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.31% | -22.77% | -33.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.81% | -35.12% | -53.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.89% | -35.12% | -57.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.42% | -4.03% | -88.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.66% | -32.77% | -10.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.70% | 3.14% | +8.56% |
Volatility
TMF vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.84%. This indicates that TMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMF | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | 6.84% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.06% | 13.20% | +5.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.25% | 16.74% | +11.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.72% | 22.49% | +24.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.92% | 22.36% | +21.56% |
TMF vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMF has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMF vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than QQQ's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.26% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMF and QQQ have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMF has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to QQQ (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMF dropped -92.89% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.59% vs -17.04% for TMF. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.59% return vs -17.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.
TMF is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for TMF and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMF and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer