TMF vs. AAPL
TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) is Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while AAPL (Apple Inc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, TMF returned -17.04%/yr vs 29.63%/yr for AAPL. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
TMF vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMF achieves a -8.42% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 11.12% return. Over the past 10 years, TMF has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of -17.04%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.63% annualized return.
TMF
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -8.42%
- 6M
- -10.21%
- 1Y
- -2.46%
- 3Y*
- -21.29%
- 5Y*
- -31.41%
- 10Y*
- -17.04%
AAPL
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 11.12%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 48.46%
- 3Y*
- 19.11%
- 5Y*
- 19.46%
- 10Y*
- 29.63%
TMF vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -8.42% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 11.12% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMF and AAPL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2009 | -0.14 |
The correlation between TMF and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (all time) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMF vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
TMF
AAPL
TMF vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMF | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.39 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 3.53 | -3.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.21 | 8.89 | -9.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMF | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 | 2.18 | -2.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.68 | 0.71 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.39 | 1.03 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.14 | 0.44 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
TMF vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMF drawdown since its inception was -92.89%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMF and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMF | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.89% | -81.80% | -11.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | -13.80% | -12.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.31% | -33.36% | -22.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.81% | -33.36% | -55.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.89% | -38.52% | -54.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.42% | -4.33% | -88.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.66% | -29.60% | -14.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.70% | 5.48% | +6.22% |
Volatility
TMF vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Apple Inc (AAPL) at 5.68%. This indicates that TMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMF | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | 5.68% | +2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.06% | 15.99% | +3.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.25% | 22.41% | +5.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.72% | 27.47% | +19.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.92% | 28.91% | +15.01% |
Dividends
TMF vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than AAPL's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.26% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMF and AAPL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMF has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to AAPL (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMF dropped -92.89% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMF and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer