TMF vs. AAPL
TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) is Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while AAPL (Apple Inc) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, TMF returned -17.99%/yr vs 30.70%/yr for AAPL. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
TMF vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMF achieves a -11.04% return, which is significantly lower than AAPL's 20.35% return. Over the past 10 years, TMF has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of -17.99%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.70% annualized return.
TMF
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- -9.25%
- 6M
- -12.35%
- YTD
- -11.04%
- 1Y
- -4.28%
- 3Y*
- -21.59%
- 5Y*
- -33.52%
- 10Y*
- -17.99%
- ALL TIME*
- -6.34%
AAPL
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- 9.59%
- 6M
- 28.05%
- YTD
- 20.35%
- 1Y
- 55.26%
- 3Y*
- 19.94%
- 5Y*
- 18.17%
- 10Y*
- 30.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.46%
TMF vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -11.04% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 20.35% | 9.05% | 30.71% | 49.01% | -26.40% | 34.65% | 82.31% | 88.96% | -5.39% | 48.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMF and AAPL is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2009 | -0.14 |
The correlation between TMF and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (all time) to 0.13 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMF vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank
TMF
AAPL
TMF vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMF | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.41 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | 4.02 | -4.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.32 | 9.58 | -9.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMF vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMF drawdown since its inception was -92.89%, which is greater than AAPL's maximum drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMF and AAPL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMF | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.89% | -81.80% | -11.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | -13.80% | -12.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.47% | -33.36% | -20.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.81% | -33.36% | -55.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.89% | -38.52% | -54.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.64% | -2.14% | -90.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.97% | -29.54% | -14.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.22% | 5.78% | +7.44% |
Volatility
TMF vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) is 7.53%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 10.61%. This indicates that TMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMF | AAPL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.53% | 10.61% | -3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.87% | 19.34% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.62% | 24.55% | +3.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.39% | 27.79% | +18.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.72% | 29.08% | +14.64% |
Dividends
TMF vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison
TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than AAPL's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.44% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMF and AAPL have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAPL has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to TMF (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMF dropped -92.89% vs AAPL's -81.80%.
AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMF and AAPL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer