PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMDV vs. VFVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TMDV vs. VFVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TMDV vs. VFVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
4.14%2.91%2.64%2.25%-5.10%23.45%4.82%3.26%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
2.10%14.77%7.67%17.37%-3.96%36.94%2.28%3.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMDV achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly higher than VFVA's 2.10% return.


TMDV

1D
0.27%
1M
-6.06%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.03%
1Y
5.15%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*

VFVA

1D
0.20%
1M
-4.12%
YTD
2.10%
6M
6.23%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TMDV vs. VFVA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMDV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VFVA's 0.13% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TMDV vs. VFVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMDV
TMDV Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

VFVA
VFVA Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VFVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFVA Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VFVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFVA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMDV vs. VFVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMDVVFVADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.35

0.94

-0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.61

1.45

-0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.21

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

1.35

-0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.42

5.36

-3.94

TMDV vs. VFVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the VFVA Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMDV and VFVA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMDVVFVADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

0.94

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.48

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.39

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between TMDV and VFVA is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TMDV vs. VFVA - Dividend Comparison

TMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, more than VFVA's 2.09% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
2.63%2.65%2.70%2.45%2.46%2.14%2.28%0.16%0.00%
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
2.09%2.13%2.40%2.45%2.21%1.68%2.04%2.08%1.65%

Drawdowns

TMDV vs. VFVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMDV drawdown since its inception was -33.42%, smaller than the maximum VFVA drawdown of -48.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDV and VFVA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TMDVVFVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.42%

-48.58%

+15.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-15.54%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

-24.07%

+6.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.91%

-6.24%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-7.43%

+2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

3.91%

-0.26%

Volatility

TMDV vs. VFVA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) is 3.78%, while Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that TMDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TMDVVFVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

4.33%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

11.07%

-2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.86%

22.24%

-7.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

20.25%

-5.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

24.51%

-5.73%