TMDV vs. TMVE
TMDV (ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF) and TMVE (Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - TMDV tracks the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index while TMVE tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMDV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for TMVE.
Performance
TMDV vs. TMVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMDV achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than TMVE's 17.39% return.
TMDV
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 8.08%
- 1Y
- 11.29%
- 3Y*
- 6.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- —
TMVE
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 17.39%
- 6M
- 16.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMDV vs. TMVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 9.14% | 1.64% |
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 17.39% | 6.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMDV and TMVE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMDV vs. TMVE — Risk / Return Rank
TMDV
TMVE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TMDV vs. TMVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMDV | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.78 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMDV vs. TMVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMDV drawdown since its inception was -33.42%, which is greater than TMVE's maximum drawdown of -8.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDV and TMVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMDV | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.42% | -8.21% | -25.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -0.69% | -1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.41% | -1.43% | -3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | — | — |
Volatility
TMDV vs. TMVE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMDV | TMVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.13% | 13.81% | -1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 13.81% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 13.81% | +4.79% |
TMDV vs. TMVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMDV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TMVE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMDV vs. TMVE - Dividend Comparison
TMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than TMVE's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 2.51% | 2.65% | 2.70% | 2.45% | 2.46% | 2.14% | 2.28% | 0.16% |
TMVE Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF | 0.10% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMDV and TMVE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMDV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMDV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMVE.
TMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.10% for TMVE.
TMDV tracks Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index, while TMVE tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TMDV and 0.55% for TMVE.
Find the right allocation for TMDV and TMVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer