PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMDV vs. TMVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMDV vs. TMVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMDV achieves a 9.14% return, which is significantly lower than TMVE's 17.39% return.


TMDV

1D
0.66%
1M
3.29%
YTD
9.14%
6M
8.08%
1Y
11.29%
3Y*
6.48%
5Y*
3.80%
10Y*

TMVE

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.25%
YTD
17.39%
6M
16.23%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMDV vs. TMVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TMDV and TMVE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMDV vs. TMVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMDV
TMDV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
TMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

TMVE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMDV vs. TMVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF (TMVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMDVTMVEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.78

TMDV vs. TMVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMDV vs. TMVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMDV drawdown since its inception was -33.42%, which is greater than TMVE's maximum drawdown of -8.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDV and TMVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMDVTMVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.42%

-8.21%

-25.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-0.69%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-1.43%

-3.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

Volatility

TMDV vs. TMVE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMDVTMVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.13%

13.81%

-1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.42%

13.81%

+0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

13.81%

+4.79%

TMDV vs. TMVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMDV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TMVE's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMDV vs. TMVE - Dividend Comparison

TMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, more than TMVE's 0.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
2.51%2.65%2.70%2.45%2.46%2.14%2.28%0.16%
TMVE
Thrivent Mid Cap Value ETF
0.10%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMDV and TMVE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TMDV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TMDV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMVE.

TMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.51%, compared with 0.10% for TMVE.

TMDV tracks Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index, while TMVE tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TMDV and 0.55% for TMVE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMDV and TMVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer