PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMDV vs. EQRR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TMDV vs. EQRR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TMDV vs. EQRR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
4.14%2.91%2.64%2.25%-5.10%23.45%4.82%3.26%
EQRR
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF
7.59%15.49%7.69%9.19%2.20%36.11%-10.14%2.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMDV achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than EQRR's 7.59% return.


TMDV

1D
0.27%
1M
-6.06%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.03%
1Y
5.15%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*

EQRR

1D
-0.72%
1M
0.35%
YTD
7.59%
6M
10.49%
1Y
18.38%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
10.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TMDV vs. EQRR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TMDV and EQRR have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Return for Risk

TMDV vs. EQRR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMDV
TMDV Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

EQRR
EQRR Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EQRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQRR Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EQRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQRR Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMDV vs. EQRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMDVEQRRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.35

1.02

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.61

1.42

-0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.22

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

1.30

-0.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.42

6.15

-4.73

TMDV vs. EQRR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the EQRR Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMDV and EQRR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMDVEQRRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

1.02

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.50

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.35

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between TMDV and EQRR is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

TMDV vs. EQRR - Dividend Comparison

TMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, more than EQRR's 1.43% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
2.63%2.65%2.70%2.45%2.46%2.14%2.28%0.16%0.00%0.00%
EQRR
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF
1.43%1.70%2.17%2.77%2.34%1.71%2.17%2.05%2.47%0.69%

Drawdowns

TMDV vs. EQRR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMDV drawdown since its inception was -33.42%, smaller than the maximum EQRR drawdown of -57.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDV and EQRR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TMDVEQRRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.42%

-57.93%

+24.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-14.30%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

-21.75%

+4.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.91%

-1.03%

-5.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-10.27%

+4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

3.03%

+0.62%

Volatility

TMDV vs. EQRR - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) have volatilities of 3.78% and 3.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TMDVEQRRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

3.97%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

10.70%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.86%

18.15%

-3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

21.49%

-7.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

25.03%

-6.25%