EQRR vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
EQRR and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EQRR is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq U.S. Large Cap Equities for Rising Rates Index. It was launched on Jul 24, 2017. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both EQRR and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EQRR or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between EQRR and SCHG is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EQRR vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EQRR:
0.53
SCHG:
2.22
EQRR:
0.84
SCHG:
2.86
EQRR:
1.10
SCHG:
1.40
EQRR:
0.67
SCHG:
3.13
EQRR:
1.56
SCHG:
12.34
EQRR:
4.63%
SCHG:
3.14%
EQRR:
13.62%
SCHG:
17.45%
EQRR:
-57.92%
SCHG:
-34.59%
EQRR:
-9.51%
SCHG:
-2.75%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EQRR achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 37.04% return.
EQRR
7.07%
-7.80%
-2.05%
7.04%
8.25%
N/A
SCHG
37.04%
3.40%
12.88%
37.14%
20.24%
16.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EQRR vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
EQRR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EQRR vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EQRR vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
EQRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than SCHG's 0.41% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF | 1.63% | 2.76% | 2.34% | 1.71% | 2.17% | 2.05% | 2.47% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
EQRR vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EQRR drawdown since its inception was -57.92%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQRR and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EQRR vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) is 3.70%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that EQRR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.