PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQRR vs. ABEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EQRR vs. ABEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQRR achieves a 29.00% return, which is significantly higher than ABEQ's 7.25% return.


EQRR

1D
1.75%
1M
4.41%
6M
23.60%
YTD
29.00%
1Y
40.33%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
13.84%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.68%

ABEQ

1D
-0.55%
1M
1.03%
6M
2.70%
YTD
7.25%
1Y
13.33%
3Y*
11.85%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$409.13K$484.14K$484.63K
$235.70K$533.46K$2.90M

EQRR vs. ABEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EQRR
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF
29.00%15.49%7.69%9.19%2.20%36.11%-9.60%
ABEQ
Absolute Select Value ETF
7.25%15.32%12.68%4.63%-1.00%12.49%2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between EQRR and ABEQ is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2020

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between EQRR and ABEQ has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EQRR vs. ABEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EQRR
ABEQ

Technology

40.2%
4.4%

Energy

21.6%
11.0%

Financial Services

18.8%
27.5%

Communication Services

9.7%
6.2%

Industrials

5.5%
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

15.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.2%

Healthcare

-

6.5%

Real Estate

-

5.2%

Utilities

-

3.9%

Technology

EQRR
40.2%
ABEQ
4.4%

Energy

EQRR
21.6%
ABEQ
11.0%

Financial Services

EQRR
18.8%
ABEQ
27.5%

Communication Services

EQRR
9.7%
ABEQ
6.2%

Industrials

EQRR
5.5%
ABEQ
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EQRR
4.3%
ABEQ

-

Basic Materials

EQRR

-

ABEQ
15.5%

Consumer Defensive

EQRR

-

ABEQ
8.2%

Healthcare

EQRR

-

ABEQ
6.5%

Real Estate

EQRR

-

ABEQ
5.2%

Utilities

EQRR

-

ABEQ
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQRR vs. ABEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EQRR
EQRR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EQRR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQRR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQRR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EQRR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQRR Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

ABEQ
ABEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ABEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ABEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EQRR vs. ABEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) and Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EQRRABEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.26

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.73

1.69

+6.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.43

3.35

+23.08

EQRR vs. ABEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQRR Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the ABEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQRR and ABEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQRR vs. ABEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQRR drawdown since its inception was -57.93%, which is greater than ABEQ's maximum drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQRR and ABEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQRRABEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.93%

-27.82%

-30.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.95%

-7.89%

+2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.75%

-7.95%

-9.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.75%

-17.26%

-4.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.02%

+4.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.93%

-4.12%

-5.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

3.97%

-2.52%

Volatility

EQRR vs. ABEQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF (EQRR) has a higher volatility of 3.47% compared to Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ) at 3.23%. This indicates that EQRR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQRRABEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

3.23%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.86%

6.72%

+5.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.98%

9.10%

+5.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.22%

10.78%

+10.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.77%

13.75%

+11.02%

EQRR vs. ABEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQRR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ABEQ's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

EQRR vs. ABEQ - Dividend Comparison

EQRR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than ABEQ's 1.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABEQ
Absolute Select Value ETF
1.18%1.25%1.48%2.60%1.20%0.60%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EQRR
ProShares Equities for Rising Rates ETF
1.07%1.70%2.17%2.77%2.34%1.71%2.17%2.05%2.47%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


EQRR and ABEQ have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EQRR has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to ABEQ (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQRR dropped -57.93% vs ABEQ's -27.82%.

On 5-year performance, EQRR leads with 13.84% vs 8.35% for ABEQ. On fees, EQRR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ABEQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EQRR has performed better with a 13.84% return vs 8.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EQRR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ABEQ.

ABEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 1.07% for EQRR.

EQRR is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while ABEQ is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Absolute Investment Advisers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EQRR and 0.85% for ABEQ.

EQRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQRR and ABEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer