TMDV vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
TMDV and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 2019. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. Both TMDV and COWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TMDV vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMDV vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 4.14% | 2.91% | 2.64% | 2.25% | -5.10% | 23.45% | 4.82% | 3.26% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 3.91% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 42.57% | 11.65% | 2.33% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMDV achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 3.91% return.
TMDV
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -6.06%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 4.03%
- 1Y
- 5.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.21%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- —
COWZ
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- YTD
- 3.91%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 16.64%
- 3Y*
- 12.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.92%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMDV vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMDV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMDV vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
TMDV
COWZ
TMDV vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMDV | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.35 | 0.96 | -0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.61 | 1.43 | -0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.21 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | 1.20 | -0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.42 | 5.59 | -4.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMDV | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 0.96 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.62 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.63 | -0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMDV and COWZ is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TMDV vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
TMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, more than COWZ's 2.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 2.63% | 2.65% | 2.70% | 2.45% | 2.46% | 2.14% | 2.28% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.07% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
TMDV vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMDV drawdown since its inception was -33.42%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDV and COWZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMDV | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.42% | -38.63% | +5.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.52% | -13.55% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.11% | -22.00% | +4.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.91% | -3.72% | -3.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.42% | -4.85% | -0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.65% | 2.92% | +0.73% |
Volatility
TMDV vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.96%. This indicates that TMDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMDV | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 2.96% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.35% | 8.37% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.86% | 17.50% | -2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 17.73% | -3.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.78% | 20.08% | -1.30% |