COWZ vs. GCOW
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW).
COWZ and GCOW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. GCOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2016. Both COWZ and GCOW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: COWZ or GCOW.
Correlation
The correlation between COWZ and GCOW is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
COWZ vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
COWZ:
-0.13
GCOW:
0.97
COWZ:
-0.05
GCOW:
1.37
COWZ:
0.99
GCOW:
1.19
COWZ:
-0.11
GCOW:
1.08
COWZ:
-0.36
GCOW:
3.65
COWZ:
6.55%
GCOW:
3.66%
COWZ:
18.93%
GCOW:
13.79%
COWZ:
-38.63%
GCOW:
-37.64%
COWZ:
-13.60%
GCOW:
-1.54%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COWZ achieves a -6.54% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 10.03% return.
COWZ
-6.54%
7.02%
-7.34%
-2.27%
19.20%
N/A
GCOW
10.03%
7.92%
6.16%
12.65%
14.40%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COWZ vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
COWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
COWZ vs. GCOW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
COWZ
GCOW
COWZ vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
COWZ vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than GCOW's 3.92% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.93% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 3.92% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
COWZ vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COWZ drawdown since its inception was -38.63%, roughly equal to the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWZ and GCOW. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
COWZ vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a higher volatility of 13.20% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 9.59%. This indicates that COWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.