COWZ vs. COWG
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG).
COWZ and COWG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. COWG is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. It was launched on Dec 21, 2022. Both COWZ and COWG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
COWZ vs. COWG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COWZ vs. COWG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 4.30% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.37% |
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | -4.15% | 10.24% | 34.99% | 20.69% | -0.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COWZ achieves a 4.30% return, which is significantly higher than COWG's -4.15% return.
COWZ
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- 4.30%
- 6M
- 10.31%
- 1Y
- 16.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.26%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- —
COWG
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- -4.39%
- YTD
- -4.15%
- 6M
- -6.87%
- 1Y
- 9.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COWZ vs. COWG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both COWZ and COWG have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Return for Risk
COWZ vs. COWG — Risk / Return Rank
COWZ
COWG
COWZ vs. COWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COWZ | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 0.44 | +0.52 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.44 | 0.78 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.11 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 0.75 | +0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.06 | 2.44 | +3.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COWZ | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 0.44 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.93 | -0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between COWZ and COWG is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
COWZ vs. COWG - Dividend Comparison
COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than COWG's 0.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.06% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.35% | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
COWZ vs. COWG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COWZ drawdown since its inception was -38.63%, which is greater than COWG's maximum drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWZ and COWG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COWZ | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.63% | -23.60% | -15.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.55% | -12.96% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.36% | -8.21% | +4.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -3.35% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 3.96% | -1.05% |
Volatility
COWZ vs. COWG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) is 3.00%, while Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that COWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COWZ | COWG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 6.09% | -3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.36% | 13.24% | -4.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.50% | 22.50% | -5.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.73% | 19.34% | -1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.08% | 19.34% | +0.74% |