PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMDV vs. BITU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TMDV vs. BITU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TMDV vs. BITU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
4.14%2.91%1.01%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
-46.65%-37.07%37.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMDV achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly higher than BITU's -46.65% return.


TMDV

1D
0.27%
1M
-6.06%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.03%
1Y
5.15%
3Y*
4.21%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*

BITU

1D
0.89%
1M
-5.67%
YTD
-46.65%
6M
-72.88%
1Y
-55.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TMDV vs. BITU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMDV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BITU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TMDV vs. BITU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMDV
TMDV Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

BITU
BITU Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BITU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITU Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITU Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BITU Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITU Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMDV vs. BITU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMDVBITUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.35

-0.61

+0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.61

-0.59

+1.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.93

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.49

-0.67

+1.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.42

-1.29

+2.71

TMDV vs. BITU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is higher than the BITU Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMDV and BITU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMDVBITUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

-0.61

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

-0.32

+0.63

Correlation

The correlation between TMDV and BITU is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TMDV vs. BITU - Dividend Comparison

TMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than BITU's 78.08% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
TMDV
ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF
2.63%2.65%2.70%2.45%2.46%2.14%2.28%0.16%
BITU
Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF
78.08%50.23%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TMDV vs. BITU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMDV drawdown since its inception was -33.42%, smaller than the maximum BITU drawdown of -77.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDV and BITU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TMDVBITUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.42%

-77.76%

+44.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-77.76%

+67.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.91%

-76.14%

+69.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.42%

-31.36%

+25.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

40.50%

-36.85%

Volatility

TMDV vs. BITU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) is 3.78%, while Proshares Ultra Bitcoin ETF (BITU) has a volatility of 26.02%. This indicates that TMDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TMDVBITUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

26.02%

-22.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

74.12%

-65.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.86%

90.32%

-75.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

99.57%

-85.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

99.57%

-80.79%