TMAAX vs. TMSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX).
TMAAX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 30, 2005. TMSIX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 30, 1993.
Performance
TMAAX vs. TMSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMAAX vs. TMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | -4.21% | 15.13% | 19.29% | 17.06% | -17.79% | 15.74% | 14.13% | 21.47% | -6.30% | 11.50% |
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | -2.40% | 4.64% | 14.08% | 13.90% | -17.68% | 28.06% | 21.96% | 24.88% | -10.47% | 18.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMAAX achieves a -4.21% return, which is significantly lower than TMSIX's -2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, TMAAX has underperformed TMSIX with an annualized return of 8.73%, while TMSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.16% annualized return.
TMAAX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- 1Y
- 12.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.73%
TMSIX
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -8.39%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -0.70%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMAAX vs. TMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMAAX has a 1.33% expense ratio, which is higher than TMSIX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMAAX vs. TMSIX — Risk / Return Rank
TMAAX
TMSIX
TMAAX vs. TMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) and Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMAAX | TMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 0.34 | +0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 0.62 | +0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.08 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 0.34 | +0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.41 | 1.38 | +4.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMAAX | TMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.34 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.25 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.55 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.44 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMAAX and TMSIX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TMAAX vs. TMSIX - Dividend Comparison
TMAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, less than TMSIX's 12.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMAAX Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A | 7.61% | 7.29% | 11.82% | 3.55% | 3.03% | 6.94% | 4.16% | 6.27% | 6.01% | 1.10% | 0.99% | 0.76% |
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | 12.70% | 12.39% | 7.91% | 1.48% | 2.86% | 10.77% | 3.26% | 2.77% | 11.64% | 7.92% | 4.10% | 11.95% |
Drawdowns
TMAAX vs. TMSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMAAX drawdown since its inception was -50.54%, smaller than the maximum TMSIX drawdown of -56.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAAX and TMSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMAAX | TMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.54% | -56.10% | +5.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.88% | -13.29% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.55% | -31.57% | +5.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.99% | -40.66% | +13.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -8.97% | +1.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.41% | -10.06% | +2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 3.29% | -1.17% |
Volatility
TMAAX vs. TMSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A (TMAAX) is 4.06%, while Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) has a volatility of 5.48%. This indicates that TMAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMAAX | TMSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 5.48% | -1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | 10.71% | -3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.98% | 19.02% | -5.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 20.37% | -6.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.28% | 20.40% | -7.12% |