TLZIX vs. TLHIX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund (TLZIX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX).
TLZIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009. TLHIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009.
Performance
TLZIX vs. TLHIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TLZIX vs. TLHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLZIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund | -1.46% | 18.86% | 13.52% | 18.98% | -16.69% | 14.86% | 16.26% | 24.52% | -6.39% | 18.09% |
TLHIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund | -1.08% | 15.76% | 10.59% | 15.54% | -15.72% | 11.65% | 14.76% | 21.35% | -5.07% | 14.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLZIX achieves a -1.46% return, which is significantly lower than TLHIX's -1.08% return. Over the past 10 years, TLZIX has outperformed TLHIX with an annualized return of 10.10%, while TLHIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.33% annualized return.
TLZIX
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- -4.81%
- YTD
- -1.46%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 16.76%
- 3Y*
- 14.10%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 10.10%
TLHIX
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -3.88%
- YTD
- -1.08%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 13.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TLZIX vs. TLHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TLZIX and TLHIX have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
TLZIX vs. TLHIX — Risk / Return Rank
TLZIX
TLHIX
TLZIX vs. TLHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund (TLZIX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLZIX | TLHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 1.38 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 1.99 | -0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 1.77 | -0.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.64 | 7.93 | -0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLZIX | TLHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.38 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.58 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.75 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.73 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between TLZIX and TLHIX is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TLZIX vs. TLHIX - Dividend Comparison
TLZIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than TLHIX's 4.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLZIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund | 3.88% | 3.82% | 2.49% | 2.11% | 2.62% | 2.93% | 1.95% | 2.26% | 2.68% | 0.18% | 2.64% | 0.31% |
TLHIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund | 4.25% | 4.20% | 3.62% | 2.44% | 2.82% | 3.21% | 2.06% | 2.25% | 2.68% | 0.14% | 2.49% | 0.25% |
Drawdowns
TLZIX vs. TLHIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLZIX drawdown since its inception was -28.82%, which is greater than TLHIX's maximum drawdown of -23.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLZIX and TLHIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLZIX | TLHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.82% | -23.86% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.49% | -7.32% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.21% | -22.15% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.82% | -23.86% | -4.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.68% | -4.53% | -1.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -3.52% | -0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 1.64% | +0.43% |
Volatility
TLZIX vs. TLHIX - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund (TLZIX) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX) at 3.86%. This indicates that TLZIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TLZIX | TLHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 3.86% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.75% | 5.93% | +1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.33% | 10.06% | +3.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.83% | 10.22% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 11.08% | +2.83% |