PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLZIX vs. TRRDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLZIX vs. TRRDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund (TLZIX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund (TRRDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TLZIX having a 10.03% return and TRRDX slightly lower at 10.00%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TLZIX having a 11.09% annualized return and TRRDX not far behind at 10.58%.


TLZIX

1D
0.30%
1M
3.95%
YTD
10.03%
6M
10.96%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
17.46%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
11.09%

TRRDX

1D
0.13%
1M
3.25%
YTD
10.00%
6M
6.38%
1Y
18.14%
3Y*
15.45%
5Y*
7.32%
10Y*
10.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLZIX vs. TRRDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLZIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund
10.03%18.86%13.52%18.98%-16.69%14.86%16.26%24.52%-6.39%18.09%
TRRDX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund
10.00%12.53%13.15%19.60%-18.77%16.52%18.10%24.71%-7.41%22.03%

Correlation

The correlation between TLZIX and TRRDX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2009

0.97

The correlation between TLZIX and TRRDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLZIX vs. TRRDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLZIX
TLZIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TLZIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLZIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLZIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
TLZIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLZIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

TRRDX
TRRDX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
TRRDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLZIX vs. TRRDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund (TLZIX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund (TRRDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLZIXTRRDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.51

1.69

+0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.51

2.36

+1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.32

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

2.05

+1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.46

8.36

+6.10

TLZIX vs. TRRDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLZIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the TRRDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLZIX and TRRDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLZIXTRRDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

1.69

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.52

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.73

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.59

+0.16

Drawdowns

TLZIX vs. TRRDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLZIX drawdown since its inception was -28.82%, smaller than the maximum TRRDX drawdown of -53.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLZIX and TRRDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLZIXTRRDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.82%

-53.50%

+24.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.77%

-8.88%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.92%

-14.03%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.21%

-27.26%

+3.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.82%

-31.46%

+2.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.01%

-6.54%

+2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

2.18%

-0.43%

Volatility

TLZIX vs. TRRDX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund (TLZIX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund (TRRDX) have volatilities of 3.05% and 3.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLZIXTRRDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

3.21%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.98%

9.58%

-1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.99%

11.40%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.87%

14.14%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.94%

14.63%

-0.69%

TLZIX vs. TRRDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLZIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TRRDX's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLZIX vs. TRRDX - Dividend Comparison

TLZIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, while TRRDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TLZIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund
3.47%3.82%2.49%2.11%2.62%2.93%1.95%2.26%2.68%0.18%2.64%0.31%
TRRDX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2040 Fund
0.00%0.00%2.26%5.60%8.92%7.92%4.96%6.10%9.51%3.96%3.36%4.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TLZIX and TRRDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TRRDX has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to TLZIX (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLZIX dropped -28.82% vs TRRDX's -53.50%.

TLZIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLZIX and TRRDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer