TLT vs. ISRG
TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while ISRG (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, TLT returned -2.20%/yr vs 16.51%/yr for ISRG. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
TLT vs. ISRG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLT achieves a -1.57% return, which is significantly higher than ISRG's -37.64% return. Over the past 10 years, TLT has underperformed ISRG with an annualized return of -2.20%, while ISRG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.51% annualized return.
TLT
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- 6M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -1.57%
- 1Y
- 2.90%
- 3Y*
- -2.24%
- 5Y*
- -7.64%
- 10Y*
- -2.20%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.56%
ISRG
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -13.18%
- 6M
- -33.99%
- YTD
- -37.64%
- 1Y
- -31.90%
- 3Y*
- 1.61%
- 5Y*
- 2.32%
- 10Y*
- 16.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.90%
TLT vs. ISRG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -1.57% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -4.60% | 18.15% | 14.12% | -1.61% | 9.18% |
ISRG Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | -37.64% | 8.51% | 54.72% | 27.14% | -26.15% | 31.76% | 38.39% | 23.43% | 31.23% | 72.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLT and ISRG is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2002 | -0.13 |
The correlation between TLT and ISRG shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLT vs. ISRG — Risk / Return Rank
TLT
ISRG
TLT vs. ISRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLT | ISRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.84 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | -0.77 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.87 | -1.77 | +2.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLT vs. ISRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLT drawdown since its inception was -48.35%, smaller than the maximum ISRG drawdown of -82.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLT and ISRG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLT | ISRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.35% | -82.26% | +33.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.58% | -41.74% | +34.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -43.42% | +25.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.70% | -49.90% | +6.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.35% | -49.90% | +1.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.21% | -42.15% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.95% | -21.33% | +7.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 18.06% | -14.71% |
Volatility
TLT vs. ISRG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) is 2.63%, while Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) has a volatility of 19.26%. This indicates that TLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLT | ISRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 19.26% | -16.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.82% | 27.17% | -20.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.41% | 35.38% | -25.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.75% | 34.17% | -18.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 32.87% | -18.03% |
Dividends
TLT vs. ISRG - Dividend Comparison
TLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, while ISRG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRG Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.65% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLT and ISRG have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISRG has higher volatility (19.26%) compared to TLT (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLT dropped -48.35% vs ISRG's -82.26%.
TLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLT and ISRG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer