PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFITX vs. TLZIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFITX vs. TLZIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2065 Fund (TFITX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund (TLZIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFITX achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly higher than TLZIX's 9.82% return.


TFITX

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.73%
YTD
11.85%
6M
11.19%
1Y
26.93%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*

TLZIX

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.52%
YTD
9.82%
6M
9.26%
1Y
22.81%
3Y*
17.10%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
11.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFITX vs. TLZIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TFITX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2065 Fund
11.85%21.24%15.76%21.16%-17.62%18.06%10.38%
TLZIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund
9.82%18.86%13.52%18.98%-16.69%14.86%8.51%

Correlation

The correlation between TFITX and TLZIX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

1.00

The correlation between TFITX and TLZIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFITX vs. TLZIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFITX
TFITX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TFITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFITX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TFITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFITX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

TLZIX
TLZIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TLZIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLZIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLZIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TLZIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLZIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFITX vs. TLZIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2065 Fund (TFITX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund (TLZIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TFITXTLZIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

3.07

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.48

13.28

+0.20

TFITX vs. TLZIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFITX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the TLZIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFITX and TLZIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TFITX vs. TLZIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFITX drawdown since its inception was -25.64%, smaller than the maximum TLZIX drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFITX and TLZIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFITXTLZIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.64%

-28.82%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.12%

-7.77%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.56%

-12.92%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.64%

-24.21%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.51%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.23%

-4.00%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.79%

+0.29%

Volatility

TFITX vs. TLZIX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2065 Fund (TFITX) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund (TLZIX) at 4.20%. This indicates that TFITX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLZIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFITXTLZIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.04%

4.20%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

8.79%

+1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.63%

10.62%

+2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.11%

12.97%

+2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.90%

13.97%

+0.93%

TFITX vs. TLZIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFITX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than TLZIX's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TFITX vs. TLZIX - Dividend Comparison

TFITX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than TLZIX's 3.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TFITX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2065 Fund
2.18%2.44%2.12%2.05%2.09%1.84%1.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLZIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2040 Fund
3.48%3.82%2.49%2.11%2.62%2.93%1.95%2.26%2.68%0.18%2.64%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, TFITX and TLZIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TFITX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to TLZIX (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFITX dropped -25.64% vs TLZIX's -28.82%.

TLZIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFITX and TLZIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer