TINY vs. SNSR

Last updated Jun 21, 2026

TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) and SNSR (Global X Internet of Things ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - TINY tracks the Solactive Nanotechnology Index while SNSR tracks the Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TINY returned 33.52%/yr vs 14.58%/yr for SNSR. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TINY charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for SNSR.

Performance

TINY vs. SNSR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 76.47% return, which is significantly higher than SNSR's 38.76% return.

TINY

• 1D: 3.75%
• 1M: 19.80%
• YTD: 76.47%
• 6M: 79.83%
• 1Y: 126.79%
• 3Y*: 33.52%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SNSR

• 1D: 3.71%
• 1M: 4.65%
• YTD: 38.76%
• 6M: 37.41%
• 1Y: 43.77%
• 3Y*: 14.58%
• 5Y*: 8.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINY vs. SNSR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	76.47%	19.98%	6.63%	47.97%	-34.14%	8.60%
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF	38.76%	6.46%	-0.45%	23.06%	-25.50%	5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between TINY and SNSR is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021	0.83

The correlation between TINY and SNSR shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TINY vs. SNSR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TINY	SNSR
Technology	70.5%	80.5%
Healthcare	10.4%	5.1%
Basic Materials	9.8%	0.2%
Industrials	4.8%	13.6%
Consumer Cyclical	4.6%	-
Communication Services	-	0.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

TINY vs. SNSR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINY

TINY Risk / Return Rank: 93
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 89
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 94

SNSR

SNSR Risk / Return Rank: 52
SNSR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
SNSR Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
SNSR Omega Ratio Rank: 47
SNSR Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
SNSR Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINY vs. SNSR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TINY	SNSR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.68	1.65	+2.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.13	2.25	+1.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.29	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.46	3.00	+4.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.18	8.94	+17.24

TINY vs. SNSR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINY Sharpe Ratio is 3.68, which is higher than the SNSR Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINY and SNSR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TINY vs. SNSR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, which is greater than SNSR's maximum drawdown of -38.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and SNSR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TINY	SNSR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.79%	-38.46%	-5.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.75%	-14.30%	-2.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.13%	-28.32%	-13.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.68%	+4.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.01%	-9.48%	-6.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.76%	4.78%	-0.02%

Volatility

TINY vs. SNSR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) is 11.33%, while Global X Internet of Things ETF (SNSR) has a volatility of 13.82%. This indicates that TINY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNSR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TINY	SNSR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.33%	13.82%	-2.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.92%	21.23%	+6.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.91%	25.99%	+7.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.58%	25.60%	+6.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.58%	24.86%	+7.72%

TINY vs. SNSR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than SNSR's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINY vs. SNSR - Dividend Comparison

TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than SNSR's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
SNSR Global X Internet of Things ETF	0.39%	0.54%	0.73%	0.74%	0.82%	0.43%	0.21%	1.12%	1.25%	1.11%	0.31%
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	0.17%	0.29%	0.01%	0.35%	0.42%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TINY and SNSR in my portfolio?

TINY and SNSR have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TINY or SNSR?

SNSR has higher volatility (13.82%) compared to TINY (11.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs SNSR's -38.46%.

Which ETF is better, TINY or SNSR?

On 3-year performance, TINY leads with 33.52% vs 14.58% for SNSR. On fees, TINY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, TINY has been the lower-risk option at 11.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TINY or SNSR?

Over the 3-year period, TINY has performed better with a 33.52% return vs 14.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TINY or SNSR?

TINY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for SNSR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TINY or SNSR?

SNSR has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.17% for TINY.

What is the main difference between TINY and SNSR?

TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while SNSR tracks Indxx Global Internet of Things Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINY and 0.68% for SNSR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.68 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.