TINY vs. QLD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - TINY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TINY returned 32.44%/yr vs 43.61%/yr for QLD. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TINY charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QLD.

Performance

TINY vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 66.66% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's 29.58% return.

TINY

• 1D: -6.24%
• 1M: 10.57%
• YTD: 66.66%
• 6M: 66.53%
• 1Y: 113.36%
• 3Y*: 32.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QLD

• 1D: -6.61%
• 1M: -2.02%
• YTD: 29.58%
• 6M: 26.13%
• 1Y: 66.80%
• 3Y*: 43.61%
• 5Y*: 21.41%
• 10Y*: 36.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINY vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	66.66%	19.98%	6.63%	47.97%	-34.14%	8.60%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	29.58%	30.36%	42.82%	117.72%	-60.52%	9.29%

Correlation

The correlation between TINY and QLD is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021	0.81

The correlation between TINY and QLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

TINY vs. QLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TINY	QLD
Technology	70.5%	58.7%
Healthcare	10.4%	3.7%
Basic Materials	9.8%	1.0%
Industrials	4.8%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	4.6%	11.4%
Communication Services	-	14.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.4%
Energy	-	0.5%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

TINY vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINY

TINY Risk / Return Rank: 91
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 86
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 94

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 53
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINY vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TINY	QLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.30	1.88	+1.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.74	2.33	+1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.31	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.81	2.67	+4.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.81	9.05	+14.76

TINY vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINY Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is higher than the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINY and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TINY vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and QLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TINY	QLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.79%	-83.13%	+39.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.75%	-25.13%	+8.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.13%	-42.29%	+0.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-63.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-63.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.24%	-9.26%	+3.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.99%	-18.14%	+2.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.78%	7.40%	-2.62%

Volatility

TINY vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) is 13.31%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 18.22%. This indicates that TINY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TINY	QLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.31%	18.22%	-4.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.58%	28.95%	-0.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.52%	35.77%	-1.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.69%	45.34%	-12.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.69%	44.80%	-12.11%

TINY vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINY vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, more than QLD's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.13%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	0.18%	0.29%	0.01%	0.35%	0.42%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TINY and QLD in my portfolio?

TINY and QLD have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TINY or QLD?

QLD has higher volatility (18.22%) compared to TINY (13.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs QLD's -83.13%.

Which ETF is better, TINY or QLD?

On 3-year performance, QLD leads with 43.61% vs 32.44% for TINY. On fees, TINY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, TINY has been the lower-risk option at 13.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TINY or QLD?

Over the 3-year period, QLD has performed better with a 43.61% return vs 32.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TINY or QLD?

TINY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TINY or QLD?

TINY has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.

What is the main difference between TINY and QLD?

TINY is categorized as Technology Equities, while QLD is Leveraged Equities. TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINY and 0.95% for QLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.