PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TINY vs. IGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TINY vs. IGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 59.78% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -5.19% return.


TINY

1D
2.63%
1M
15.50%
YTD
59.78%
6M
60.21%
1Y
114.15%
3Y*
31.25%
5Y*
10Y*

IGV

1D
-4.33%
1M
13.30%
YTD
-5.19%
6M
-6.07%
1Y
-4.56%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*
16.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINY vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
59.78%19.98%6.63%47.97%-34.14%8.73%
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET
-5.19%5.56%23.41%58.56%-35.65%-7.63%

Correlation

The correlation between TINY and IGV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between TINY and IGV has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TINY vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TINY
IGV

Technology

79.0%
89.2%

Healthcare

8.6%

-

Basic Materials

7.7%

-

Industrials

4.7%
0.2%

Communication Services

-

8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

1.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

TINY
79.0%
IGV
89.2%

Healthcare

TINY
8.6%
IGV

-

Basic Materials

TINY
7.7%
IGV

-

Industrials

TINY
4.7%
IGV
0.2%

Communication Services

TINY

-

IGV
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

TINY

-

IGV
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

TINY

-

IGV

-

Energy

TINY

-

IGV

-

Financial Services

TINY

-

IGV
1.8%

Real Estate

TINY

-

IGV

-

Utilities

TINY

-

IGV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TINY vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINY
TINY Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

IGV
IGV Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
IGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGV Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
IGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGV Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINY vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TINYIGVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.52

-0.17

+3.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.97

-0.04

+4.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

0.99

+0.53

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.85

-0.13

+6.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

24.13

-0.27

+24.40

TINY vs. IGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINY Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is higher than the IGV Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINY and IGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TINYIGVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52

-0.17

+3.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.37

+0.20

Drawdowns

TINY vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and IGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TINYIGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.79%

-63.45%

+19.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.75%

-36.61%

+19.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.13%

-36.61%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-14.93%

+14.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.16%

-14.44%

-1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.75%

17.22%

-12.47%

Volatility

TINY vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) have volatilities of 12.04% and 11.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TINYIGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.04%

11.63%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.40%

24.39%

+2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.66%

27.61%

+5.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.37%

27.86%

+4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.37%

26.35%

+6.02%

TINY vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IGV's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

TINY vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison

TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while IGV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.01%0.00%0.35%0.02%0.16%0.09%0.82%0.22%
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
0.18%0.29%0.01%0.35%0.42%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TINY and IGV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TINY has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to IGV (11.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs IGV's -63.45%.

On 3-year performance, TINY leads with 31.25% vs 14.91% for IGV. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IGV has been the lower-risk option at 11.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TINY has performed better with a 31.25% return vs 14.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGV is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for TINY.

TINY has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for IGV.

TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while IGV tracks S&P North American Technology-Software Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINY and 0.46% for IGV.

TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINY and IGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer