PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TINT vs. OILU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TINT vs. OILU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINT achieves a 15.69% return, which is significantly lower than OILU's 95.09% return.


TINT

1D
-0.40%
1M
-2.42%
6M
7.68%
YTD
15.69%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
4.82%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.41%

OILU

1D
3.79%
1M
38.67%
6M
37.11%
YTD
95.09%
1Y
107.91%
3Y*
1.15%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.21M$8.45M$7.94M
$21.03K$17.30K$33.22K

TINT vs. OILU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
15.69%16.13%-13.37%20.04%-28.14%-3.70%
OILU
MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN
95.09%-16.50%-21.65%-32.50%151.08%-16.79%

Correlation

The correlation between TINT and OILU is -0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021

0.31

The correlation between TINT and OILU shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TINT vs. OILU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TINT
OILU

Basic Materials

70.5%

-

Technology

18.4%

-

Industrials

7.9%

-

Financial Services

2.5%

-

Healthcare

0.7%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

TINT
70.5%
OILU

-

Technology

TINT
18.4%
OILU

-

Industrials

TINT
7.9%
OILU

-

Financial Services

TINT
2.5%
OILU

-

Healthcare

TINT
0.7%
OILU

-

Communication Services

TINT

-

OILU

-

Consumer Cyclical

TINT

-

OILU

-

Consumer Defensive

TINT

-

OILU

-

Energy

TINT

-

OILU
100.0%

Real Estate

TINT

-

OILU

-

Utilities

TINT

-

OILU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TINT vs. OILU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TINT
TINT Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
TINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINT Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINT Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

OILU
OILU Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
OILU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
OILU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILU Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TINT vs. OILU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TINTOILUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.24

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

2.07

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.56

5.11

-0.55

TINT vs. OILU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the OILU Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINT and OILU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TINT vs. OILU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINT drawdown since its inception was -41.36%, smaller than the maximum OILU drawdown of -81.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINT and OILU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TINTOILUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.36%

-81.00%

+39.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.53%

-46.49%

+28.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.42%

-69.09%

+38.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.48%

-47.53%

+38.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.64%

-50.69%

+30.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

18.88%

-13.25%

Volatility

TINT vs. OILU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) is 5.54%, while MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN (OILU) has a volatility of 19.22%. This indicates that TINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TINTOILUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.54%

19.22%

-13.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.41%

51.99%

-30.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.72%

64.36%

-39.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.48%

80.80%

-57.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.48%

80.80%

-57.32%

TINT vs. OILU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than OILU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

TINT vs. OILU - Dividend Comparison

TINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while OILU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
OILU
MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TINT
ProShares Smart Materials ETF
1.19%1.27%1.47%0.99%1.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


TINT and OILU have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILU has higher volatility (19.22%) compared to TINT (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINT dropped -41.36% vs OILU's -81.00%.

On 3-year performance, TINT leads with 4.82% vs 1.15% for OILU. On fees, TINT is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, TINT has been the lower-risk option at 5.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TINT has performed better with a 4.82% return vs 1.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TINT is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OILU.

TINT has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.00% for OILU.

TINT is categorized as Energy Equities, while OILU is Leveraged Equities. TINT tracks Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net, while OILU tracks Solactive MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINT and 0.95% for OILU.

OILU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINT and OILU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer